Innovative Strategies for Building Community Among Faculty Who Teach in Virtual Environments
A previous qualitative study (Schwartz, Wiley, & Kaplan, 2016) described the faculty experiences and reflections of delivering Master of Social Work (MSW) education via a virtual platform at the University of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work during its initial years of operation. Thematic analysis revealed a need for community building amongst geographically diverse faculty. Given social work’s emphasis on the person-in-environment perspective, it is imperative to consider the experiences of those individuals responsible for executing virtual technology-supported programs and delivering education via virtual platforms. The current paper describes innovative institutional and programmatic interventions implemented to promote community and collaboration among faculty who teach virtually. Creating strategic opportunities for virtual and ground-based faculty to connect informally and formally has the potential to foster a culture of inclusivity, connection, and a productive community of practice.
Adedoyin, A. C. A. (2016). Deploying virtual communities of practice as a digital tool in social work: A rapid review and critique of the literature. Social Work Education, 25(3), 357-370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1154660
Akkirman, A. D., & Harris, D. L. (2005). Organizational communication satisfaction in the virtual workplace. Journal of Management Development, 24(5), 397-409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510598427
Ayala, J. S. (2009). Blended learning as a new approach to social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 277-288. doi: https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700112
Bryant, L., Garnham, B., Tedmanson, D., & Diamandi, S. (2015). Tele-social work and mental health in rural and remote communities in Australia. International Social Work, 61(1), 143-155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815606794
Cappiccie, A., & Desrosiers, P. (2011). Lessons learned from using Adobe Connect in the social work classroom. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29, 296-302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2011.638239
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Constantine Brown, J. L., & Park, H-S. (2016). Longitudinal student research competency: Comparing online and traditional face-to-face learning platforms. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 44-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.18060/20870
Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 511-532. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.145
Cummings, S. M., Chaffin, K. M., & Cockerham, C. (2015). Comparative analysis of an online and traditional MSW program: Educational outcomes. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(1), 109-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.977170
Curry, S. P. (2016). Effects of the virtual environment on online faculty perceptions of leadership: A grounded theory study (Doctoral Dissertation Northcentral University). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (ProQuest 10110291)
Dolan, V. (2011). The isolation of online adjunct faculty and its impact on their performance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 62-77. doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.793
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Adline.
Hill Jones, S. (2015). Benefits and challenges of online education for clinical social work: Three examples. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43, 225-235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0508-z
Huang, X. S., & Hsaio, E-L. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15-30.
Levin, S., Whitsett, D., & Wood, G. (2013). Teaching MSW social work practice in a blended online learning environment. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4-5), 408-420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.829168
Lloyd, S, A., Byrne, M. M., & McCoy, T. S. (2012). Faculty-perceived barriers of online education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1-12.
Marlow, S. L, Lacerenza, C. N., & Salas, E. (2017). Communication in virtual teams: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 575-589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005
Milton, S. A., Sinclair, M. M., & Vakalahi, H. O. (2016). Organizational identification: Perspectives of dispersed social workers. Advances in Social Work, 17(2), 285-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.18060/21014
Nicklin, J. M., McNall, L. A., Cerasoli, C. P., Varga, C. M., & McGivney, R. J. (2016). Teaching online: Applying need theory to the work-family interface. The American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 167-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1187042
Noble, D., & Russell, A. C. (2013). Research on webbed connectivity in a web-based learning environment: Online social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4-5), 496-513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.829167
Peach, H. G., & Bieber, J. P. (2015). Faculty and online education as a mechanism of power. Distance Education, 36(1), 26-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019971
Reamer, F. (2013). Distance and online social work education: Novel ethical challenges. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4-5), 369-384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.828669
Robbins, S. P., Coe Regan, J. R., Williams, J. H., Smyth, N. J., & Bogo, M. (2016). From the Editor – The future of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(4), 387-397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1218222
Sardeshmukh, S. R., Sharma, D., & Golden, T. D. (2012). Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: A job demands and job resources model. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(3), 193-207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00284.x
Schwartz, S. L., Wiley, J. L., & Kaplan, C. D. (2016). Community building in a virtual teaching environment. Advances in Social Work, 7(1), 15-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.18060/20875
Secret, M., Bentley, K. J., & Kadolph, J. C. (2016). Student voices speak quality assurance: Continual improvement in online social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(1), 30-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1112630
Smith, W. (2015). Relational dimensions of virtual social work education: Mentoring faculty in a web-based learning environment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43, 236-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0510-5
Stolzer, R. L. (2012). Serving rural communities with distance education degree programs. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(2), 109-117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.699510
Tandy, C., & Meacham, M. (2009). Removing the barriers for students with disabilities: Accessible online and web-enhanced courses. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 29(3), 313-328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841230903022118
Uehara, E. S., Barth, R. P., Olson, S., Catalano, R. F., Hawkins, J. D., Kemp, S., Nurius, P. S.,…Sherraden, M. (2015). Identifying and tackling grand challenges for social work (Grand Challenges for Social Work Initiative Working Paper No. 3). Baltimore, MD: American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare. Retrieved from http://aaswsw.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/WP3-with-cover.pdf
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Wretman, C. J., & Macy, R. J. (2016). Technology in social work education: A systematic review. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(4), 409-421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1198293
York, R. O. (2008). Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), 157-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700031
Copyright to works published in Advances in Social Work is retained by the author(s).