Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, DOIs for references have been provided. Web-only references include URLs and date of access.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • DOIs, if available, are provided.
  • If the manuscript was prepared by more than one person, contributions of each person are clearly spelled out in a note added at the end of the document, before the list of citations.

Author Guidelines

To submit an article or other item for consideration, contributors should ensure that the following criteria are met. We welcome inquiries about possible submissions.

Reference Style

Hypothesis follows the MLA Style Manual for references. Consult Citing Medicine: The NLM Style Guide for Authors, Editors, and Publishers, 2nd edition, for further information and examples.

Research Papers

Form of review: Double-blind peer review by two reviewers, with additional unblinded review by editor(s). 

Multiple authorship and other contributors: If the manuscript was prepared by more than one person, contributions of each person are clearly spelled out in a note added at the end of the document, before the list of citations. 

Sections of Manuscript:

STRUCTURED ABSTRACT: Objective, population or problem, methods, findings, and conclusions (300 words). Consult the MLA Research Section’s structured abstract guidelines for more information on abstract requirements.

BODY OF PAPER (5000 words): Consult the MLA Style Manual for help with formatting and style.

  • INTRODUCTION: Provide concise overview of study, including research questions, population or problem, methods.
  • LITERATURE REVIEW: Explain the need for research based on prior work. Use JMLA-approved citation style (see http://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ltd/fid=198).
  • METHODS: Clearly explain process of gathering appropriate and sufficient information to answer research questions. The process may be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods, but it should be replicable based on provided information. Include mention of human subjects approval, if appropriate, as an appendix, survey questions or other information needed for replicability.
  • FINDINGS: Clearly explain process of analyzing findings, using figures and/or tables (no more than 2) to illustrate results. Additional links to data should be listed in article, as appropriate. 
  • DISCUSSION: Discuss implications of findings and suggestions for future research. Be transparent about assumptions, possible bias, and weaknesses of design or processes: no research is perfect!

Peer review will be based on how well submitted work has followed evidence-based guidelines for research. The rubric for review is provided for your use as a checklist. If you are a new researcher, you are encouraged to contact a research mentor through MLA (see Professional Development / Find or Become a Mentor, or http://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=45).

Other Hypothesis Categories

Project or Program Descriptions (5000 word maximum). Open (unblinded) review by editors. 
Topics of interest (e.g., reflections on research activities in progress, reviews of resources) to Section and general MLA membership are welcome. Length, format, and other elements will depend on content. Items will be reviewed for style and grammar prior to approval. 

OA: Items of Interest (structured abstracts)

This new column will help spread the word about research that's only published in open access repositories. Your submission should: be of possible interest to MLA and Research Caucus members; include authors' permission statement ; include a structured abstract; and a link to the item in its repository. Items will be reviewed for content to ensure suitability, and may be edited for style and grammar prior to approval in an unblinded editor review.

 

Hypothesis: Failure (5000 word maximum). Open (unblinded) review by editors. Edited by Heather Holmes, articles submitted to this column are full-length explorations of roadblocks and stumbles. File it under 'lessons learned' - and share these experiences so that others can also benefit. Inquiries about possible topics are very welcome! Please use the following conventions: introduction, body, and conclusions (a.k.a. lessons learned or advice to others). 

Letters to the Editor (500 word maximum) Open (unblinded) review by editors. 
Letters can be general commentary on topics of interest to MLA members or commentary on recent Hypothesis research publications. If the letter is research commentary, it will be sent to the lead author of the paper to invite their (optional) commentary; letters and authors’ responses (if provided) are published together.  Items will be reviewed for style and grammar prior to approval.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.