Benchmarking study of hospital libraries

Keywords: benchmarking, hospital libraries

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the current landscape of hospital libraries by collecting benchmarking data from hospital librarians in the U.S. and other countries. Since the last MLA benchmarking survey in 2002 hospital libraries have faced significant changes including downsizing, position and library elimination, and hospital mergers. This survey will provides information to inform the development and implementation of effective advocacy for hospital libraries.
Methods
: A web-based, anonymous survey was designed to collect information from hospital librarians representing stand-alone hospitals and hospital systems. The 57-question survey was distributed via select list servs, targeting the US and Canada but open to any country. The topic areas covered hospital/health system, library, and library staff demographics; library characteristics and scope of service; interlibrary loan and document delivery; library funding; and library budget. Hospital library benchmarking surveys, including the previous MLA surveys, were reviewed and applicable questions were added.
Results
: There were a total of 180 respondents but the total number of responses for each question varied. Select results are as follows: of the responding libraries, 67.2% were part of a hospital system; 24.4% had merged with or were bought by another hospital or health system and, of those, 77.1% had acquired 1-5 hospitals in the last 10 years; 77.9% were not for profits; over half (55.2%) had <5,001 FTE in the organization; 56.9% had one library; 47.7% had 1 FTE librarian, 34.9% had 2-5; 82.1% did not or were not able to use social media; 60.7% didn’t have strategic plans; 66.1% belonged to a consortium; 48.2% provided up to 250 search requests a year; 66.3% did not receive funding outside of their organization; 32.5% had budgets for print books totaling less than $1,000; 30.1% had budgets, excluding salaries, of less than $100,000 and 9.7% had budgets over $1M.
Conclusions
: These findings contribute to the field’s knowledge of hospital library demographics as well as the services provided. The results suggest implications for hospital librarians regarding staffing levels and the depth of services within their unique settings, especially within the context of rapidly expanding health systems.

Author Biographies

Angela Spencer

Assistant Professor, Health Sciences Reference Librarian
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO
angela.spencer@slu.edu

Elizabeth Mamo

Library Director
Rochester Regional Health
Rochester NY
Elizabeth.Mamo@rochesterregional.org

Brooke L. Billman

Medical Librarian
College of American Pathologists
Northfield IL
bbillma@cap.org

References

Kaufman Hall & Associates LLC. 2017 in Review: the year M&A shook the healthcare landscape. Chicago, IL; 2018.

Martin HJ, Delawska-Elliott B. Combining resources, combining forces: regionalizing hospital library services in a large statewide health system. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015;103(1):44-8.

Gibson DS, Hernandez M, Draemel A. Destination library: validating the importance of physical space. J Hosp Libr. 2015;15(3):251-61.

Thibodeau PL, Funk CJ. Trends in hospital librarianship and hospital library services: 1989 to 2006. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(4):273-9.

Jones B, Honour J. Looking at MCR library closures: whats happening and why? Plains to Peaks Post: A Publication of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine, MidContinental Region. 2015;13(4):9-11.

Harrow A, Marks LA, Schneider D, Lyubechansky A, Aaronson E, Kysh L, et al. Hospital library closures and consolidations: a case series. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019;107(2):129-36.

Giesler RH, Yast HT. A Survey of current hospital library resources. Hospitals. 1964;38:55-7.

Schick FL, Crawford S. Directory of health sciences libraries in the United States, 1969. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1970.

Crawford S, Dandurant G. Directory of Health Sciences Libraries in the United States, 1973. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1974.

Rees AMCS. Directory of health sciences libraries in the United States, 1979. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University; 1980.

Crawford S. Health science libraries in the United States: III. Hospital health science libraries, 1969-1979. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1983;71(1):30-6.

Wos M, Oddan L. Effect of institutional mergers on hospital libraries. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987;75(1):34-5.

Stevens SR. Impact of changing health care economics on Michigan hospital libraries: report of a survey. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990;78(2):140-5.

Wakeley PJ, Foster EC. A survey of health sciences libraries in hospitals: implications for the 1990s. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993;81(2):123-8.

Glitz B, Lovas I, Flack V. The changing status of hospital libraries 1984 to 1989: characteristics and services in Region 7 of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992;80(2):179-84.

Dudden RF, Corcoran K, Kaplan J, Magouirk J, Rand DC, Smith BT. The Medical Library Association Benchmarking Network: development and implementation. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94(2):107-17.

Bertolucci YR, Van Houten L, Balogh L. Riding the wave from benchmarking to bucks. In: Fulda PO, Satterthwaite RK, editors. Proceedings, 103rd Annual Meeting Medical Library Association, Inc; May 4, 2003; San Diego, CA: J Med Libr Assoc; 2003. p. 117-54.

Fama J. “But we made the ‘easy’ cuts last year!” staffing the library. In: Fulda PO, Satterthwaite RK, editors. Proceedings, 104th Annual Meeting Medical Library Association, Inc; May 25, 2004; Washington, DC: J Med Libr Assoc; 2005. p. 143-88.

Gluck JC, Hassig RA. Raising the bar: the importance of hospital library standards in the continuing medical education accreditation process. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001;89(3):272-6.

Van Moorsel G. Analysis of compliance of hospital libraries with the Medical Library Association staffing standard: examination of the current state of the industry and reconsideration of the standard. J Hosp Libr. 2009;9(3):273-85.

Ducas A, Demczuk L, Macdonald K. Results of a survey to benchmark Canadian health facility libraries. J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2015;36(1):3-10.

Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. The Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter; 1967.

McLaughlin L, Spencer A, Zeblisky K, Liszczynskyj H, Laera E. Solo census: demographics, duties, needs and challenges. J Hosp Libr. 2018;18(2):127-35.

Hospital Libraries Section Standards Committee, Bandy M, Doyle JD, Fladger A, Frumento KS, Girouard L, et al. Standards for hospital libraries 2007: Hospital Libraries Section Standards Committee. J Med Libr Assoc. 2008;96(2):162-9.

Kraft M. The Donut hole of library access. 2018 Jun 18. In: Krafty Librarian [Internet]: Michelle Kraft. [cited 2019 Jun 20]. Available from: http://www.kraftylibrarian.com/the-donut-hole-of-library-access/

Published
2019-11-21
How to Cite
Spencer, A., Mamo, E., & Billman, B. (2019). Benchmarking study of hospital libraries. Hypothesis, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.18060/23805
Section
Research