Table of Contents
Front Matter
| Front Matter | |
| Indiana Law Review |
Symposium
| Symposium: National Power and State Autonomy: Calibrating the New "New Federalism" | |
| Cynthia A. Baker, Jonathan D. Mattingly | 1-2 |
| Introductory Remarks: Enumerated and Reserved Powers: The "Perpetually Arising Question" | |
| James W. Torke | 3-10 |
| Listening to the "Sounds of Sovereignty" But Missing the Beat: Does the New Federalism Really Matter? | |
| Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr. | 11-26 |
| Sounds of Sovereignty: Defining Federalism in the 1900s | |
| John C. Yoo | 27-44 |
| Whose Federalism? | |
| S. Elizabeth Wilborn Malloy | 45-70 |
| Federal Power to Commandeer State Courts: Implications for the Theory of Judicial Federalism | |
| Martin H. Redish, Steven G. Sklaver | 71-110 |
| Printz and Testa: The Infrastructure of Federal Supremacy | |
| Vicki C. Jackson | 111-140 |
| Discovering the Impact of the "New Federalism" on State Policy Makers: A State Attorney General's Perspective | |
| Jeffrey A. Modisett | 141-154 |
| Congressional Federalism and the Judicial Power: Horizontal and Vertical Tension Merge | |
| W. William Hodes | 155-162 |
| The Powers of Congress Under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment After City of Boerne v. Flores | |
| Ronald D. Rotunda | 163-192 |
| A Comment on Congressional Enforcement | |
| Saikrishna Prakash | 193-212 |
Book Review
| The Illusory Nature of Environmental Protection in a Marxist-Socialist Polity: The Case of Poland | |
| Michael J. Kelly | 213-224 |
Notes
| Court-Appointed Expert Panels: A Comparison of Two Models | |
| Karen Butler Reisinger | 225-258 |
| Jaffe v. Redmond: The Supreme Court's Dramatic Shift Supports the Recognition of a Federal Parent-Child Privilege | |
| Nissa M. Ricafort | 259-295 |
Indiana Law Review Archive