The Every Student Succeeds Act and Level 5 English Learners: Reflections from an Indiana High School Teacher
English Learners (ELs) who move from being Limited English Proficient (LEP) to Fluent English Proficient (FEP) are regarded as Reclassified Fluent English Proficient students (RFEPs). Once they become RFEP, state and federal funding ceases and formal EL programming usually ends. RFEPs become a part of the general education population, yet their academic performance is often subpar relative to their English-only peers. As we move into the newly authorized Every Student Succeeds Act period (ESSA, 2015), their performance on academic achievement will be included in district and school accountability for the EL subgroup four years following their reclassification. This expanded inclusion of RFEPs within the EL subgroup assumes they will perform at a commensurate level with their English-only peers, but no Indiana studies have confirmed this assertion. This study intends to fill this gap by examining an Indiana high school.
California Department of Education. (2014). Academic criterion for reclassification. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/rd/acadreclass14.asp
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA, 1965). Public Law No. 89-10 (1965).
Every Student Succeeds Act, Pub. L. No. Public Law 114-95 (December 10, 2015).
Gottfried, M. A. (2009). Evaluating the Relationship Between Student Attendance and Achievement in Urban Elementary and Middle Schools: An Instrumental Variables Approach. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 434-465. doi:10.3102/0002831209350494
Gottlieb, M. (2016). Assessing English Language Learners: Bridges to Educational Equity: Connecting Academic Language Proficiency to Student Achievement, 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Indiana Department of Education. (2017). Retrieved March 21, 2017, from https://compass.doe.in.gov/dashboard/overview.aspx?type=school&id=8003
Kanno, Y., & Kangas, S. E. (2014). "I'm Not Going to Be, Like, for the AP": English Language Learners' Limited Access to Advanced College-Preparatory Courses in High School. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 848-878. doi:10.3102/0002831214544716
Linquanti, R., Cook, H. G., Bailey, A. L., & MacDonald, R. (2016). Moving toward a more common definition of English learner: Collected guidance for states and multi-state assessment consortia. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Migrant Policy Institute. (2010). ELL information center: Fact sheet series (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
No Child Left Behind, Pub.L. 107-110, 115 Stst. 1425 (2002).
Roberts, G., Mohammed, S. S., & Vaughn, S. (2010). Reading achievement across three language groups: Growth estimates for overall reading and reading subskills obtained with the Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 668-686. doi: 10.1037/a0018983
Stevens, R. A., Butler, F. A., & Castellon-Wellington, M. (2000). Academic language and content assessment: Measuring the progress of English language learners (ELLs) (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 552). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
Tanenbaum, C., Boyle, A., Soga, K., Le Floch, K. C., Golden, L., Petroccia, M., Taylor, J. (2012). National evaluation of Title III implementation: Report on state and local implementation. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
In every case, copyright of work appearing in INTESOL Journal is retained by the author. Individual articles may be reprinted for educational purposes, provided that no fees (other than copying costs) are charged. For information regarding more extensive copying or reproduction for other purposes, contact the Managing Editor, INTESOL Journal athttps://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/intesol/index