Using Public Private Partnerships to Accelerate Student Success

  • Sandra Haynes Metropolitan State University of Denver
  • Vicki Golich Metropolitan State University of Denver
  • Steve Kreidler Metropolitan State University of Denver
Keywords: workforce, curriculum, publi/private partnerships

Abstract

Metropolitan State University of Denver (MSU Denver) has used various ways to craft curriculum that directly meets employers’ and students’ needs in key economic drivers in the State of Colorado. Moving beyond the standard industry advisory councils used in many, especially professional programs, the institution has consulted with industry leaders prior to building facilities and developing curriculum to ensure industry needs are met. As MSU Denver faculty collaborated with their industry partners, they worked to embed both content and skills throughout the curriculum to ensure alumni were prepared for this 21st Century workplace. Additionally, MSU Denver has honored past experience and on the job training of employers and employees in a way that many four-year institutions have resisted.  

Author Biographies

Sandra Haynes, Metropolitan State University of Denver

Sandra Haynes is Deputy Provost of Academic and Student Affairs a position that oversees all academic affairs units at Metropolitan State University of Denver. Prior to accepting this position, she served in the Dean’s position in the College of Professional Studies at MSU Denver for 13 years. Knowing the importance of maintaining accessible public higher education in an era of shrinking budgets, Haynes has focused her efforts on seeking alternative sources of funding for MSU Denver via public-private-partnerships and interdisciplinary programs that meet community and workforce needs imperative to generating resources, establishing community partnerships, and providing students with excellent teaching and learning experiences. 

Vicki Golich, Metropolitan State University of Denver

Vicki L. Golich is Provost and Vice President of Academic and Student Affairs at Metropolitan State University of Denver; she also oversees Information Technology Services in this role. In 1992, she was selected to be a Pew Faculty Fellow in International Affairs and participated in a two-week workshop at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government where she learned about actively engaging students in their learning by using case studies. She began her administrative career as the Director of the Faculty Center at California State University San Marcos; in this capacity, she has delivered workshops on case teaching, globalizing the curriculum, and assessment all around the world, and published several articles on the same topics.

Steve Kreidler, Metropolitan State University of Denver

Steve Kreidler is the Vice President for Administration at Metropolitan State University of Denver (MSU Denver) a position that oversees all business and operational functions for the university. Previously he served in the same position at the University of Central Oklahoma. His career includes an extensive background in economic and business development and the creation of public private partnerships inside and outside of higher education. MSU Denver has received numerous awards for their activity in partnerships and Kreidler has made multiple presentations at conferences and workshops across the nation on this topic.

References

Angelo, T.A., & Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D.J., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, I. (1994). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.47.8763&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2017). High-impact educational practices. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/defautl/files/files/LEAP/HIP_tables.pdf.

Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2017). College learning for the new global century. A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education & America’s Promise. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/GlobalCentury_final.pdf.

Bajada, C., & Trayler, R. (2013). Interdisciplinary business education: Curriculum through collaboration. Education + Training, 55(4/5), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2014-0079

Bernstein, D.I. (2016). “Public-Private Partnerships: It’s the Right Time.” Business Officer Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.nacubo.org/Business_Officer_Magazine/Business_Officer_Plus/Bonus_Material/Public-Private_Partnerships_It%E2%80%99s_the_Right_Time.html.

Boehrer, J. (1990-91). Spectators and gladiators: Reconnecting the students with the problem. Teaching excellence – Toward the best in the academy, 2(7), 1–2.

Bridging the gap between higher education and the workplace: A profile of college graduates in Colorado. (2015). Washington, DC: Gallup.

Busteed, B. (2015). Gallup-Purdue index: Great jobs and great lives. Washington, DC: Gallup.

Chickering, A.W., & Gamson, Z.F. (1991). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991(47), 63–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219914708

Colorado Workforce Development Council (20216). The Colorado Talent Pipeline Report. Denver, CO: State of Colorado. Retrieved from https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/17-0109_2016_CO_Talent_Pipeline_Report_1.pdf.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Lexington, MA: Heath.

Doyle, T. (2008). Helping students learn in a learner centered environment: A guide to teaching in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Eisenbach, R., Golich, V., & Curry, R.R. (1998). Classroom assessment across the disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1998(75), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.7506

Ewell, P.T., & Jones, D.P. (1991). Actions matter: The case for indirect measures in assessing higher education’s progress on the national education goals. Journal of General Education, 42(2), 123–148.

Fabry, V., Eisenbach, R., Curry, R.R., & Golich, V.L. (1997). Thank you for asking: Classroom assessment techniques and students’ perceptions of learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), 3–21.

Harris, D., & Bell, C. (1990). Evaluating and assessing for learning (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Kogan Page.

Jankowski, N.A. (2016). Unpacking relationships: Instruction and student outcomes. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Jankowski, N.A., Ikenberry, S.O., & Kuh, G.D. (2009). Using evidence of student learning to improve higher education. New York, NY: John Wiley

King, A. (1993). From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35. Retrieved from http://0-www.jstor.org.skyline.ucdenver.edu/stable/27558571. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781

Kuh, G.D. (2008) High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

McDermott, L.C., & Shaffer, P.S. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60(11), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17003

McKeachie, W.J., Pintrich, P.r., Lin, Y.G., & Smith, D. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

Meyers, N.M., & Nulty, D.D. (2009). How to use (five) curriculum design principles to align authentic learning environments, assessment, students’ approaches to thinking and learning outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802226502

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco , CA: Jossey-Bass.

MSU Denver Graduate Program Approval Process (2017). Denver, CO: Metropolitan State University of Denver. Retrieved from https://www.msudenver.edu/media/content/graduatecouncil/gradapprovalprocess%202%203%2017.pdf.

Newman, L.E., Carpenter, S., Grawe, N., & Jaret-McKinstry, S. (2014). Creating a culture conducive to integrative learning. Peer Review, 16(4), 14–15.

Pascarella, F.T., & Terenzini, P.T. How college affects students: Findings and insight from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Rogers, C.R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Stice, J.E. (1987). Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve student learning. Engineering Education, 77(5), 291-–.

Umbach, P.D. & Wawrzynski, M.R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement Research in Higher Education, 46(153), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1

What is the “T”? (2014). East Lansing, MI. Retrieved from http://tsummit.org/t.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://www.myilibrary.com?ID=93304.

Zakrajsek, T., & Doyle, T. (2012). Follow the Research. In Learner-Centered Teaching (pp. 7–20). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Published
2018-08-15