Types of Anchor Institution Initiatives

An Overview of University Urban Development Literature

Authors

  • Paul Garton Seton Hall University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18060/25242

Keywords:

Anchor institutions, Community engagement, Town-gown, Urban universities, Urban development

Abstract

Interest in universities as anchor institutions within their communities and cities is growing as civic leaders search for ways to build local wealth. Systematic analysis of the effects of anchor institution initiatives remains difficult due to the disparate nature of anchor initiatives and a relative lack of a shared language describing the work. This article reviews the anchor literature to summarize current understandings of universities and economic development, then develops a typology of anchor institution initiatives based upon the literature. The typology is based upon the type of capital leveraged by initiatives: (a) financial, (b) physical, (c) intellectual, and (d) human. The author then uses the typology to categorize a number of initiatives found within the literature and through a rough sampling process. This typology offers a shared language for scholars to use to guide discussions around universities as anchor institutions, and, more importantly, the typology can frame analyses of the differential effects, costs, and benefits of different anchor strategies.

Author Biography

Paul Garton, Seton Hall University

Paul Garton is a Visiting Assistant Professor of Quantitative Methods in the Department of Education Leadership, Management, and Policy at Seton Hall University.

References

Ahlfeldt, G. & Maennig, W. (2009). Arenas, arena architecture and the impact on location desirability: The case of ‘Olympic arenas’ in Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin. Urban Studies, 46(7), 1343 – 1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009104569

Alperovitz, G. (2013). What then must we do? Straight talk about the next American Revolution. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.

Anderson, M. B. & Sternberg, C. (2012). “‘Non-White’ gentrification in Chicago’s Bronzeville and Pilsen: Racial economy and the intraurban contingency of urban redevelopment. Urban Affairs Review, 49(3), 435 – 467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412465590

Andersson, R. Quigley, J. M., & Wilhelmsson, M. (2009). Urbanization, productivity, and innovation: Evidence from investment in higher education. Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 2 – 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.02.004

Appleseed. (2003). Engines of economic growth: The economic impact of Boston’s eight research universities on the metropolitan Boston area. Boston, MA: Appleseed.

Arteaga, C. (2018). The effect of human capital on earnings: Evidence from a reform at Colombia’s top university. Journal of Public Economics,157, 212 – 225.

Baum-Snow, N. & Hartley, D. (2016). Causes and consequences of central neighborhood change, 1970 – 2010. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto.

Bender, T. (1988). Introduction. In Bender (Ed.), The university and the city: From medieval origins to the present (3 – 12). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Brown-Saracino, J. (2004). Social preservationists and the quest for authentic community. City & Community, 3(2), 135 – 156.

Cantoni, D. & Yuchtman, N. (2014). Medieval universities, legal institutions, and the commercial revolution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), 823 – 887. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju007

Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167 – 207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100002

Clark, D. & Martorell, P. (2014). The signaling value of a high school diploma. Journal of Political Economy, 122(2), 282 – 318.

Clark, W. A. V. (1986). Residential segregation in American cities: A review and interpretation. Population Research and Policy Review, 5, 95 – 127.

CEOs for Cities with Living Cities. (2010). How to behave like an anchor institution. Cleveland, OH: CEOs for Cities.

Coates, D. & Depken, C. A. (2009). The impact of college football games on local sales tax revenue: Evidence from four cities in Texas. Eastern Economic Journal, 35(4), 531 – 547.

Couture, V. & Handbury, J. (2017). Urban revival in America, 2000 – 2010. No. 24084. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w24084.

Crane, L., Harter, J., & Trehan, A. (2010). Institutions as fulcrums of change. Washington, DC: Partners for Livable Communities.

Dalton, L. C., Hajrasouliha, A. H. & Riggs, W. W. (2018). State of the art in planning for college and university campuses: Site planning and beyond. Journal of the American Planning Association, 84(2), 145 – 161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1435300

Democracy Collaborative. (2018). Anchor dashboard learning cohort. Retrieved from https://anchors.democracycollaborative.org/higher-education-anchor-mission-initiative.html.

Doberneck, D. M., Glass, C. R., & Schweitzer, J. H. (2010). From rhetoric to reality: A typology of publicly engaged scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 14(4), 5 – 35.

Dubb, S. & Howard, T. (2012). Leveraging anchor institutions for local job creation and wealth building. Berkeley, CA: Institute for Research on Labor and Employment at the University of California, Berkeley.

Duke-Williams, O. (2009). The geographies of student migration in the UK. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1826 – 1848. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4198

Edlund, L., Machado, C., & Sviatschi, M. M. (2015). Bright minds, big rent: Gentrification and the rising returns to skill. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

Ehlenz, M. M. (2019). Gown, town, and neighborhood change: An examination of urban neighborhoods with university revitalization efforts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(3), 285 -299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17739111

Etienne, H. F. (2012). Pushing back the gates: Neighborhood perspectives on university-driven revitalization in West Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Etzkowitz, H. (2014). The second academic revolution: The rise of the entrepreneurial university and impetuses to firm foundation. In T. J. Allen & R. P. O’Shea (Eds.), Building technology transfer within research universities: An entrepreneurial approach, (12 – 32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Geiger, R. L. (2016). The ten generations of American higher education. In M. N. Bastedo, P. G. Altbach, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (4th ed.) (3 – 34). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Geiger, R. L. & Sá, C. (2005). Beyond technology transfer: US state policies to harness university research for economic development. Minerva, 43, 1 – 21.

Goode, J. G. & Schneider, J. A. (1994). Reshaping ethnic and racial relations in Philadelphia: Immigrants in a divided city. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Gregory, S. (2013). The radiant university: Space, urban development, and the public good. City & Society, 25(1), 47 – 69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12011

Grimmett, M. A., Lupton-Smith, H., Beckwith, A., Englert, M. K., & Messinger, E. (2018). The Community Counseling, Education, and Research Center (CCERC) model: Addressing community mental health needs through engagement scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(3), 201 – 230.

Gulbranson, C. A. & Audretsch, D. B. (2008). Proof of concept centers: Accelerating the commercialization of university innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 249 – 258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9086-y

Hackworth, J. & Smith, N. (2001). The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 92(4), 464 – 477. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00172

Hodges, R. A. & Dubb, S. (2012). The road half traveled: University engagement at a crossroads. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

Hoyt, L. (2013). Introduction. In L. Hoyt (Ed.), Transforming cities and minds through the scholarship of engagement (1 – 26). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

Hubbard, P. (2009). Geographies of studentification and purpose-built student accommodation: Leading separate lives? Environment and Planning A, 41, 1903 – 1923. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4149

Hwang, J. & Lin, J. (2016). What have we learned about the causes of recent gentrification? Cityscape, 18(3), 9 – 26.

Hyatt, S. B. (2010). Universities and neoliberal models of urban development: Using ethnographic fieldwork to understand the ‘Death and Rebirth of North Central Philadelphia’. Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences, 3(3), 6 – 31. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2010.030302

Initiative for a Competitive Inner City. (2011). Anchor institutions and urban economic development: From community benefit to shared value. Inner City Insights, 1(2), 1 – 9.

Iuviene, N., Stitely, A., & Hoyt, L. (2010). Sustainable economic democracy: Worker cooperatives for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Community Innovators Lab.

Kantor, S. & Whalley, A. (2014). Knowledge spillovers from research universities: Evidence from endowment value shocks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 171 – 188.

Kenyon, D. A. & Langley, A. H. (2010). Payments in lieu of taxes: Balancing municipal and nonprofit interests. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Kinton, C., Smith, D. P., & Harrison, J. (2016). De-studentification: Emptying housing and neighbourhoods of student populations. Environment and Planning A, 48(8), 1617 – 1635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16642446

Kochenkova, A., Grimaldi, R., & Munari, F. (2016). Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: A review of academic literature. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 407 – 429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9416-9

Lertwachara, K. & Cochran, J. (2007). An event study of the economic impact of professional sport franchises on local U.S. economies. Journal of Sports Economics, 8(3), 244 – 254.

Ley, D. (1986). Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: A Canadian assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76(4), 521 – 535.

Liu, S. (2015). Spillovers from universities: Evidence from the land-grant program. Journal of Urban Economics, 87, 25 – 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.03.001

Lloyd, R. D. (2006). Neo-bohemia: Art and commerce in the postindustrial city. New York, NY: Routledge.

Mandich, A. M. & Dorfman, J. H. (2017). The wage and job impacts of hospitals on local labor markets. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(2), 139 – 148.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417691609

Marcuse, P. (2015). Gentrification, social justice and personal ethics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(6), 1263 – 1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12319

Maurrasse, D. (2007). City anchors: Leveraging anchor institutions for urban success. Cleveland, OH: CEOs for Cities.

Miller, P. A. (2002). The economic impact of sports stadium construction: The case of the construction industry in St. Louis, MO. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(2), 159 – 173.

Moretti, E. (2004). Human capital externalities in cities. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics: Cities and geography (2243 – 2289). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier B. V.

Morris, K., Jones, A., & Wright, J. (2010). Anchoring growth: The role of ‘anchor institutions’ in the regeneration of UK cities. London, UK: The Work Foundation.

NACEDA. (2020). Family portrait 2020. Washington, D.C.: NACEDA.

O’Shea, R. P., Fitzgerald, C., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2014). University-based entrepreneurship: A synthesis of the literature. In T. J. Allen & R. P. O’Shea (Eds.), Building technology transfer within research universities: An entrepreneurial approach, (33 – 59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Page, B. & Ross, E. (2016). Legacies of a contested campus: Urban renewal, community resistance, and the origins of gentrification in Denver. Urban Geography, 38(9), 1293 – 1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1228420

Pearman, F. A. & Swain, W. A. (2017). School choice, gentrification, and the variable significance of racial stratification in urban neighborhoods. Sociology of Education, 90(3), 213 – 235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717710494

Porter, M. E. (1997). New strategies for inner-city economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 11 – 27.

Porter, M. E. (2016). Inner-city economic development: Learnings from 20 years of research and practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 30(2), 105 – 116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242416642320

Rich, M. A. & Tsitsos, W. (2016). Avoiding the ‘SoHo effect’ in Baltimore: Neighborhood revitalization and arts and entertainment districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(4), 736 – 756. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12376

Rooney, J. D. & Gittleman, J. (2003). A new era of higher education-community partnerships: The role and impact of colleges and universities in Greater Boston today. Boston, MA: The Carol R. Goldberg Seminar.

Rutheiser, C. (2012). The promise and prospects of anchor institutions: Some thoughts on an emerging field. Policy Development & Research Edge. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_hudpartrpt_062211.html.

Sage, J., Smith, D., & Hubbard, P. (2013). New-build studentification: A panacea for balanced communities? Urban Studies, 50(13), 2623 – 2641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013477694

Smith, D. (2008). The politics of studentification and ‘(un)balanced’ urban populations: Lessons for gentrification and sustainable communities? Urban Studies, 45(12), 2541 – 2564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008097108

Smith, D. P. & Holt, L. (2007). Studentification and ‘apprentice’ gentrifiers within British provincial towns and cities: Extending the meaning of gentrification. Environment and Planning A, 39, 142 – 161. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38476

Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography, 58(2), 139 – 155.

Taylor, H. L., Luter, D. G., & Miller, C. (2018). The university, neighborhood revitalization, and civic engagement: Toward civic engagement 3.0. Societies, 8, 106 – 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8040106

Walker, L. A. & East, J. F. (2018). The roles of foundations and universities in redevelopment planning. Metropolitan Universities, 29(2), 33 – 56. https://doi.org/10.18060/22342

Webber, H. S. & Karlström, M. (2009). Why community investment is good for nonprofit anchor institutions: Understanding costs, benefits, and the range of strategic options. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.

Wiewel, W. & Perry, D. C. (Eds.). (2008). Global universities and urban development: Case studies and analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.

Wittman, A. & Crews, T. (2012). Engaged learning economies: Aligning civic engagement and economic development in community-campus partnerships. Boston, MA: Campus Compact.

Wolf-Powers, L. (2010). Community benefits agreements and local government. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(2), 141 – 159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360903490923

Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35, 481 – 501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005

Zou, B. (2018). The local economic impacts of military personnel. Journal of Labor Economics, 36(3), 589 – 621.

Zukin, S. (2016). Gentrification in three paradoxes. City & Community, 15(3), 202 – 207. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12184

Downloads

Published

2021-09-09

Issue

Section

Articles