Comprehensive v. Abstinence-Only Sex Education in Public Schools: A Debate over Individual Health and Religious Belief
While there is little disagreement remaining over the presence of sexual education in public schools in the United States, the nation is still divided over one key issue. Specifically, there is dissidence over what method is most appropriate to convey sexual education in a way that promotes optimal mental, emotional and sexual health for students. Abstinence only education purposely excludes certain information in its teachings for fear of pushing youth towards sexual and deviant behaviors, and it promotes a lifestyle of no sexual content whatsoever until marriage. In contrast, comprehensive education is explicit in both healthy sexual activity and alternative sexual relationships. This essay examines both of the methods, their strengths and weaknesses, their demographics and their overall impact on youth.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.