Complications and Outcomes Associated with Two-Stage Treatment of Periprosthetic Total Hip Infection

Authors

  • Jacob Schmidt Indiana University School of Medicine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-1354
  • Mary Ziemba-Davis Saxony Hospital IU Health Hip & Knee Center, Indiana University Health Physicians
  • R. Michael Meneghini Saxony Hospital IU Health Hip & Knee Center, Indiana University Health Physicians

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18060/26884

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is treated with implant resection, debridement, and component reimplantation after infection eradication. Treatment consists of either a single surgery or two-stage surgery with intravenous antibiotic therapy between stages. We replicated a recent study which concluded two-stage treatment is associated with high morbidity, hypothesizing that complication rates would be similar, but that morbidity is not always conclusively a consequence of two-stage treatment for PJI

Project Methods: Prospectively documented data on all primary and revision hips undergoing two-stage treatment for PJI by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical complications were quantified for the interstage and post-reimplantation periods. Chi-squared tests were used to compare current findings to published findings.

Results: Six of seven patient demographics and comorbidities were equivalent in the two studies (p ≥ .278). More complex infections characterized the current study as evidenced by significantly more polymicrobial infections (p < .001). Spacer retention rather than component reimplantation did not occur in the current study but characterized 32 patients (16%) in the comparison study (p = .002). There were no differences in the number of additional interstage septic procedures (p = .402) and fewer post-reimplantation septic surgeries in the current study (p = .018). Using a proposed system which penalizes additional operations required to eradicate infection, treatment success rates at minimum one year follow-up were 73% and 71%, respectively (p = .856). Without these penalties, treatment success in the current study was 93% (equivalent proportion not available for comparison study). All-cause mortality was higher in the current study (18.2% versus 7.6%, p = .044) but only two deaths were related to PJI (unknown for comparison study).

Potential Impact: Study findings suggest that morbidity attributed to two-stage treatment reflect the inherent complexity of this patient group, and not the two-stage treatment itself.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-26

Issue

Section

Abstracts