Digital Accessibility and the ADA: What the New Website Rule Means for Sport Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/29657Keywords:
ADA, website accessibility, WCAG, Title II, sport organizations, Title IIIAbstract
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is best known for removing physical barriers to public life, but its guarantees of equal access extend into the digital realm. In April 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice issued the first comprehensive federal rule requiring state and local governments, including public universities, municipal recreation departments, and publicly funded sport facilities, to meet defined website and mobile application accessibility standards under Title II of the ADA. Anchored in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 Level AA, this rule transforms longstanding policy expectations into enforceable legal obligations. This article examines the legal foundations of the rule, its application to sport organizations, and the practical implications for achieving website compliance. First, it explores the operational importance of sport websites and the accessibility barriers commonly found in digital content. Next, it analyzes the statutory and regulatory requirements. Finally, it offers a practical compliance framework grounded in established best practices in digital accessibility. The goal is to equip sport managers, athletic administrators, and facility professionals with a clear and actionable guide to meeting federal requirements, reducing legal exposure, and ensuring inclusive access for all patrons.
References
42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act.
42 U.S.C. § 12132 (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act, Title II.
42 U.S.C. § 12182(a) (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act, Title III.
28 C.F.R. § 35.104 (2024).
28 C.F.R. § 35.160 (2024).
28 C.F.R. § 35.200(a) (2024).
28 C.F.R. pt. 35 (2024).
Andrews v. Blick Art Materials, LLC, 268 F. Supp. 3d 381 (E.D.N.Y. 2017).
Carvalho, M. C. N., Dias, F. S., Reis, A. G. S., & Freire, A. P. (2018). Accessibility and usability problems encountered on websites and applications in mobile devices by blind and normal-vision users. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2022–2029. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167349
CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Cotten, D. J., & Wolohan, J. T. (2017). Law for recreation and sport managers (7th ed.). Kendall Hunt Publishing.
European Disability Forum & International Association of Accessibility Professionals. (2023). Joint statement on accessibility overlays. https://www.edf-feph.org/publications/joint-statement-on-accessibility-overlays/
Federal Trade Commission. (2025, February 3). FTC order requires online marketer to pay $1 million for deceptive claims that its AI product could make websites compliant with accessibility guidelines. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-order-requires-online-marketer-pay-1-million-deceptive-claims-its-ai-product-could-make-websites
Feingold, L. (2010, February 11). MLB accessible website agreement. Law Office of Lainey Feingold. https://www.lflegal.com/2010/02/mlb-agreement
Feingold, L. (2012, June 5). First addendum to MLB settlement agreement. Law Office of Lainey Feingold. https://www.lflegal.com/2012/06/mlb-addendum
Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 257 F. Supp. 3d 1340 (S.D. Fla. 2017), rev'd, 993 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 2021).
Giraud, S., Thérouanne, P., & Steiner, D. D. (2018). Web accessibility: Filtering redundant and irrelevant information improves website usability for blind users. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 111, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.10.011
Henry, S. L., Abou-Zahra, S., & Brewer, J. (2014, March 7). The role of accessibility in a universal web. W4A 2014 - 11th Web for All Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2596695.2596719
Mahoney, M. J. (2020). Legal aspects of inclusive sport programming. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 30(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.18060/24919
Mahoney, M., & McMillen, J. D. (2011). Cowboys Stadium mobility assist program: Accessible routes and the Americans with Disabilities Act accessibility guidelines. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 21(1), 101–115.
Makati, T., Tigwell, G. W., & Shinohara, K. (2024, October 27). The promise and pitfalls of web accessibility overlays for blind and low vision users. ASSETS 2024 - Proceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. https://doi.org/10.1145/3663548.3675650
Manca, M., Palumbo, V., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2023). The transparency of automatic web accessibility evaluation tools: Design criteria, state of the art, and user perception. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 16(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3556979
McMillen, J., & Mahoney, M. J. (2011). Leisure and disability: Mobility assist program for aging and older adults. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 10, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJDHD.2011.023
Moreno, L., & Martinez, P. (2019). The harmonization of accessibility standards for public policies. Computer, 52(7), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.2888762
National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp., 452 F. Supp. 2d 946 (N.D. Cal. 2006).
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability; Accessibility of Web Information and Services of State and Local Government Entities, 89 Fed. Reg. 31,320 (Apr. 24, 2024) (to be codified at 28 C.F.R. pt. 35).
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability; Notice of Withdrawal of Four Previously Announced ANPRMs, 82 Fed. Reg. 60,932 (Dec. 26, 2017).
Rendon v. Valleycrest Prods., Ltd., 294 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2002).
Robles v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, 913 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2019).
Shah, H. (2024). Enhancing web accessibility - Navigating the upgrade of design systems from WCAG 2.0 to WCAG 2.1. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 15(1), 01–16. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijwest.2024.15101
Sinclair, R. (2019). Understanding organizational approaches to accessibility. International Association of Accessibility Professionals. https://g3ict.org/upload/IAAP_ODC_WhitePaper_Final_BB_90619.pdf
Trust for Public Land. (2023, March 9). Outdoor spaces for all abilities. https://www.tpl.org/blog/outdoor-spaces-all-abilities
U.S. Department of Justice. (2016). ADA requirements: Effective communication. https://www.ada.gov/resources/effective-communication/
U.S. Department of Justice. (2024a). Fact sheet: New rule on the accessibility of web content and mobile apps provided by state and local governments. https://www.ada.gov/resources/2024-03-08-web-rule
U.S. Department of Justice. (2024b). Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability; accessibility of web information and services of state and local governments. Federal Register, 89(80), 31320–31410. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/04/24/2024-07758/nondiscrimination-on-the-basis-of-disability-accessibility-of-web-information-and-services-of-state
WebAIM. (2025). The WebAIM million: 2025 report. https://webaim.org/projects/million
World Health Organization. (2023, March 7). Disability [Fact sheet]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
World Wide Web Consortium. (2016). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) overview. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/
World Wide Web Consortium. (2018). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
World Wide Web Consortium. (2024, December 12). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/
World Wide Web Consortium. (2025). How to meet WCAG (quick reference). https://
