Building Capacity as Anchor Institutions: Infrastructure, Structure, and Strategy
As campuses embrace their role as anchor institutions, considerations should be given to the role of infrastructure, structure, and strategy. This article differentiates between infrastructure and organizational structure then identifies implications for determining who should be involved based upon the institutional and community goals. Resources and infrastructure—a center or office that supports and coordinates community engagement—has been noted as a key component to the institutionalization of community engagement (Welch & Saltmarsh, 2013). How might the infrastructure used to support community engagement differ from the anchor institution mission? This article will illustrate potential differences and similarities while offering recommendations and considerations that would be useful as campuses develop their anchor institution plans.
Baldridge, V. & Deal, T. (1983). The dynamics of organizational change in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning- A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27 (6), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672
Birnbaum, R. 91988). How colleges work: They cybernetics of academic organizations and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Blau, P. (1994). The organization of academic work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Transaction Publications.
Blau, P., & Schoenherr, R. (1971). The structure of organizations. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Cantor, N. (2018). Of mutual benefit: Democratic engagement between universities and communities. Liberal Education, 104(2). Retrieved from https://aacu.org/liberaleducation/2018/spring/cantor
Cantor, N. & Englot, P. (2014). Civic renewal of higher education through renewed commitment to the public good. In J.N. Reich (Ed.), Civic Engagement, Civil Development, and Higher Education. Retrieved from http://archive.aacu.org/bringing_theory/documents/4civicseries_cecd_final_r.pdf
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
Chickering, A. (1999). Strategies for change. New England Research Center for Higher Education. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston.
Curry, B. (1991). Institutionalization: The final phase of the organizational change process. University of Chicago: Administrators Notebook, 3, (1), (1991)
Curry, B. (1992). Institutionalizing enduring innovations: Achieving continuity of change in higher education. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University.
Dalton, D., Todor, W., Spendolini, M. Fielding, G., & Porter, L. (1980). Organization structure and performance: A critical review. Academy of Management Review, 5 (1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1980.4288881
Dill, D., & Sporn, B. (1995). University 2001: What will the university of the twenty-first century look like? In D. Dill & B. Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly. (pp. 212-236). Tarrytown, NY: Elevier.
Dubb, S., McKinley, S. & Howard, T. (2013). Achieving the Anchor Promise: Improving Outcomes for Low-Income Children, Families and Communities. Takoma Park, MD: University of Maryland. Retrieved from https://community-wealth.org/sites/clone.community-wealth.org/files/downloads/Achieving%20the%20Anchor%20Promise_composite_FINAL.pdf
Fincher, C. (1982). Academic administration: Are there differences that matter? Athens: University of Georgia.
Fullan, M. (1991). The meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University: Teachers College Press.
Furco, A. (1999). Self-Assessment Rubric for the Institutionalization of Service-Learning in Higher Education. Berkeley, CA: Service-Learning Research and Development Center, University of California at Berkeley.
Furco, A., Weerts, D., Burton, L., & Kent, K. (2009). Assessment rubric for institutionalizing community engagement in higher education [Assessment]. Retrieved from http://www.engagement.umn.edu/community/documents/FurcoetalCEInstRubric.pdf
Gelmon, S.B., Holland, B.A., Driscoll, A., Spring, A., & Kerrigan, S.M. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement : Principles and techniques. Boston, MA: Campus Compact.
Gelmon S. B., Seifer, S. D., Kauper-Brown, J., & Mikkelsen, M. (2005). Building Capacity for Community Engagement: Institutional Self-Assessment. Seattle, WA: Community Campus Partnerships for Health. Retrieved from http://www.ccph.info/
Holland, B. A. (1997 Fall). Analyzing institutional commitment to service: A model of key organizational factors. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4 (1), 30–41. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0004.104
Holland, B.A. (2009), Will it last? Evidence of institutionalization at Carnegie classified community engagement institutions. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009 (147), 85-98. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15360741/2009/2009/147 https://doi.org/10.1002/he.361
Janke, E. & Shelton, T. (March 1, 2011). Community Engagement: Terms and Definitions for Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. University of North Carolina-Greensboro. Retrieved from https://communityengagement.uncg.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/here.pdf
Jelinek, M. (1979). Institutionalizing innovation: A study of organizational learning systems. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
Kanter, R. (1983). The changemasters: Innovations for productivity in the American corporation. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Kezar, A. (2002a). Documenting the landscape: Results of a national study on academic and student affairs collaborations. In A. Kezar, D. Hirsch & C. Burack (Eds.), New directions for higher education: Vol. 116. Understanding the role of academic and student affairs collaboration in creating a successful learning environment (Winter, pp. 39-51). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kezar, A. (2002b). Organizational models and facilitators of change: Providing a framework for student and academic affairs collaboration. In A. Kezar, D. Hirsch & C. Burack (Eds.), New directions for higher education: Vol. 116. Understanding the role of academic and student affairs collaboration in creating a successful learning environment (Winter, pp. 63-74). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Kimberly, J. (1979). Issues in the creation of organization: Initiation, innovation and institutionalization. Academy of Management Journal, 22 (3), 437-457. Retrieved from http://proxy-tu.researchport.umd.edu/login?ins=tu&url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED401828&site=eds-live&scope=site
Lewis, P., Goodman, S., & Fandt, P. (2001). Management: Challenges in the 21st century. (3rd Ed., pp. 288-298). Southwest College Publishing: Division of Thomson Learning.
Liang, J. G., & Sandmann, L. R. (2015). Leadership for community engagement: A distributed leadership perspective. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19 (1), 35-64. Retrieved from http://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/index.php/jheoe/article/view/1391
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Norris, K. E. & Weiss, H. A. (in press). CEPs as inquiring practitioners for organizational learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement.
Norris, K. E. & Weiss, H. A. (in press). Assessing community engagement. In S. Hundley & S. Kahn (Eds.), Trends in Assessment: Ideas, Opportunities, and Issues for Higher Education. Stirling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Parsons, T. (1971). The strange case of academic organization. Journal of Higher Education, 42 (6), 486-495. https://doi.org/10.2307/1979079
Pasquerella, L. (2018). In pursuit of quality and deliberative democracy. Liberal Education, 104 (2). Retrieved from https://aacu.org/liberaleducation/2018/spring/president
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, Inc.
Prentice, M. (1999). Where powerful partnership begin. About Campus, 4 (2), 11-16. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/acaa/4/2
Robbins, S. (1983). Organizational theory: The structure and design of organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rothblatt, S. (1995). Historical perspective on the university’s role in social development. In D.Dill & B.Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Thorough a glass darkly. (pp. 20-47). Tarrytown, NY: IAU Press.
Santos, F., Heitor, M., & Caraca, J. (1998). Organizational challenges for the university. Higher Education Management, 10 (3), 87-107. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/edf7/87b95496e01dcf788ec88b6b9e9c41f663d4.pdf#page=82
Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32 (1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086752
Sladek, E. (2017). Higher Education Has Always Been an Anchor. Handout. The Democracy Collaborative. Washington, DC. 2017. Print.
Tierney, W. (1988). Organizational cultures in higher education: Defining the essentials. Journal of Higher Education, 59 (1), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11778301
Tolbert, P., & Zucker, L. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusions of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (1), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392383
Zucker, L. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42 (5), 726-743. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094862
Zucker, L. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303
Welch, M. & Saltmarsh, J. (2013). Current practice and infrastructure for campus centers of community engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17 (4), 25-56. Retrieved from http://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/index.php/jheoe/article/view/1090
Copyright to works published in Metropolitan Universities is retained by the author(s).