A Pilot Project Exploring Low-tech Collaborative Board Gaming on Student Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Education





interprofessional education, gamification, board game


Objectives: The intent of this project was to explore the impact of a small, collaborative gaming experience among undergraduate students on student attitudes and beliefs about Interprofessional Education (IPE).

Methods: Health sciences librarians at two state universities used a low-tech, collaborative board game to facilitate small, in-person group gaming. The authors used an adapted version of the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS), a validated instrument that measures the four domains of the 2011 IPEC Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice, as a pre/post assessment of the impact of the gaming experience.

Results: While anecdotal evidence indicated that playing a collaborative board game had an impact on the participating students, there was no statistically based evidence that collaborative board games increases positive or negative attitudes about IPE and interprofessional collaborative practice.

Conclusions: More student participation is required for statistical significance, recruiting students and ensuring that students have enough time to complete the game play is key to future possible success.


World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice [Internet]. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice [2010; cited 2021 Jun 14]. <http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70185/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf;jsessionid=3A6C446CAAAA61EBABC031E653AD0486?sequence=1>.

Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, Freeth D, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD002213. DOI: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3 .

Reeves S, Palaganas J, Zierler B. An updated synthesis of review evidence of interprofessional education. J Allied Health. 2017 Mar;46(1):56–61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3 .

Lateef F. Inter-professional education, inter-professional practice and team science: learning together; working together. EIMJ. 2018 Feb;10(4):81–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/eimj2018.10.4.8 .

Sunguya BF, Hinthong W, Jimba M, Yasuoka J. Interprofessional education for whom? — challenges and lessons learned from its implementation in developed countries and their application to developing countries: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2014 May;9(5):e96724. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096724 .

Giordano C, Umland E, Lyons KJ. Attitudes of faculty and students in medicine and the health professions toward interprofessional education. J Allied Health. 2012 Mar;41(1):21–5.

Gary JC, Gosselin K, Bentley R. Health science center faculty attitudes towards interprofessional education and teamwork. J Interprof Care. 2018 Mar;32(2):231–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1376626 .

Fotaris P, Mastoras T. Escape rooms for learning: a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Game Based Learning [Internet]. ACPI; 2019 Oct. 30. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.34190/GBL.19.179 .

Friedrich C, Teaford H, Taubenheim A, Boland P, Sick B. Escaping the professional silo: an escape room implemented in an interprofessional education curriculum. J Interprof Care. 2019 Sep;33(5):573–5. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538941 .

Nieh H-P, Wu W-C. Effects of a collaborative board game on bullying intervention: a group-randomized controlled trial. J School Health. 2018 Oct;88(10):725–33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josh.12675 .

Arnab S, Clarke S, Morini L. Co‑creativity through play and game design thinking. EJEL. 2019 Sep;17(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/JEL.17.3.002 .

Singh P, Niranjan I. Using groupwork in the designing and playing of board games in occupational health and safety. Groupwork. 2012 Jan;22(3):65–82.

Gauthier A, Kato PM, Bul KCM, Dunwell I, Walker-Clarke A, Lameras P. Board games for health: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Games Health J. 2019 Apr;8(2):85–100. DOI: https://doi-org.unh.idm.oclc.org/10.1089/g4h.2018.0017 .

Vrbancic EK, Byerley SL. High-touch, low-tech: investigating the value of an in-person library orientation game. Coll Undergrad Libr. 2018 Jan;25(1):39–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1318429 .

Renner BR, Cahoon E, Allegri F. Low-tech scavenger hunt model for student orientation. Med Ref Serv Q. 2016 Oct;35(4):372–87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2016.1220754 .

Alvarez V. Engaging students in the library through tabletop gaming. KQ. 2017;45(4):40–9.

Elkins AJ, Hollister JM. Power up: Games and gaming in library and information science curricula in the United States. JELIS. 2020 Apr;61(2):229–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jelis.2019-0038.r1 .

Norris J, Carpenter JG, Eaton J, Guo J-W, Lassche M, Pett MA, Blumenthal DK. The development and validation of the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale: assessing the interprofessional attitudes of students in the health professions. Acad Med. 2015 Oct;90(10):1394–400. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000764 .

Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel [Internet]. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2011 [cited 2021 Jun 14]. < https://ipec.memberclicks.net/assets/2011-Original.pdf >.




How to Cite

Stark, R. K., & Opuda, E. (2022). A Pilot Project Exploring Low-tech Collaborative Board Gaming on Student Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Education. Hypothesis: Research Journal for Health Information Professionals, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.18060/25500



Hypothesis: Failure