From the Ground Up: Building a Culture of Research in an Academic Library
Keywords:Academic Libraries, Research Culture, Professional Development
Background: This article discusses the motivations, benefits, and actions taken to create and support a culture of research among library employees at a Carnegie Research 1 University Library system. Despite substantial pressures to publish and engage in library science research, many academic librarians lack the training or support to build their own research agendas. This is particularly worrisome as tenure requirements and professional trends require librarians to be knowledgeable and productive in their research dissemination.
Experience: At Clemson University Libraries, librarians responded to this problem by adapting evidence-based solutions from scientific and medical disciplines to fit their own research empowerment needs. The process of building a productive culture of research at Clemson Libraries was a multi-year endeavor that took considerable initiative, planning, and flexibility.
Discussion: Each of the initiatives required adaptation to the knowledge levels and existing culture in the Libraries. Organizers had to be willing to make changes and attempt new approaches as the organization evolved and comfort with the research process grew. Some initiatives, like Writing Circle, were disbanded, while others, like Journal Club and Research Roundtable, continue to develop with high levels of engagement.
Takeaways: The success of this progressive approach to fostering a thriving culture of research at Clemson Libraries is evident through the rates of participation, dissemination, and satisfaction of library employees in addition to the expansion of the Libraries’ engagement with research in outside departments and disciplines. Librarians who seek to enhance their own institution’s research culture should consider implementing some or all of these initiatives to jumpstart their efforts, including writing circles, journal clubs, and research roundtables.
CW Staff. Clemson moves into top tier of research universities [Internet]. Clemson World. 2013 May 1 [cited 31 Aug 2021]. Available from: https://clemson.world/clemson-moves-into-top-tier-of-research-universities/
ClemsonForward strategic plan [Internet]. [updated Mar 2019; cited 31 Aug 2021]. Available from:
Clark M, Vardeman K, Barba S. Perceived inadequacy: a study of the imposter phenomenon among college and research librarians. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2014 May [cited 31 Aug 2021];75(3):255-71. doi:10.5860/crl12-423
Andrew N, Ferguson D, Wilkie G, Corcoran T, Simpson L. (2009). Developing professional identity in nursing academics: the role of communities of practice. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2009 Aug [cited 31 Aug 2021];29(6):607-11. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.01.012
Ackerman E, Hunter J, Wilkinson ZT. The availability and effectiveness of research supports for early career academic librarians. J Acad Librariansh [Internet]. 2018 Sept [cited 31 Aug 2021];44(5):553-68. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2018.06.001
Luo L. Fusing research into practice: the role of research methods education. Libr Inf Sci Res [Internet]. 2011 Jul [cited 31 Aug 2021];33(3):191-201. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.001
Eddy PL, Gaston-Gayles JL. New faculty on the block: issues of stress and support. J Hum Behav Soc Enviro [Internet]. 2008 Oct [cited 31 Aug 2021];17(1-2):89-106 doi:10.1080/10911350802168878
Sassen C, Wahl D. Fostering research and publication in academic libraries. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2014 Jul [cited 31 Aug 2021];75(4):458-91. doi:10.5860/crl.75.4.458
Hall LW. (2018). From practice to research at Flinders University Library: sustaining a research culture. Libr Manag [Internet]. 2015 [cited 31 Aug 2021];39(8-9):615-24. doi:10.1108/LM-10-2017-0110
Kennedy MR, Brancolini, KR. Academic librarian research: a survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2012 Sept [cited 31 Aug 2021];73(5):431-48. doi:10.5860/crl-276
Apolinario RRU, Eclevia MR, Eclevia Jr. CL, Lagrama ERC, Sagun KKA. Librarian as researcher and knowledge creator: examining librarian’s research involvement, perceived capabilities and confidence. Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC
Proceedings of the IFLA Annual Congress; 2014 Aug 16-22; Lyon, France. Available from: http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/961
Kennedy MR, Brancolini, KR. Academic librarian research: an update to a survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2018 Sept [cited 31 Aug 2021];79(6):882-951 doi:10.5860/crl.79.6.822
Borrego ´A, Pinfield S. Librarians publishing in partnership with other researchers: roles, motivations, benefits, and challenges. portal [Internet]. 2020 Oct [cited 31 Aug 2021];20(4):655-75. doi:10.1353/pla.2020.0031
Aytac S, Slutsky B. Published librarian research, 2008 through 2012: analyses and perspectives. Collab Librariansh [Internet]. 2014 [cited 31 Aug 2021];6(4):6. Available from: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol6/iss4/6/
Wilkinson Z. Rock around the (tenure) clock: research strategies for new academic librarians. New Librar World. 2013 [cited 31 Aug 2021];114(1/2):54-66. doi:10.1108/03074801311291965
Morrison-Beedy D, Aronowitz T, Dyne, J, Mkandawire L. (2001). Mentoring students and junior faculty in faculty research: a win-win scenario. J Prof Nurs [Internet]. 2001 Nov-Dec [cited 31 Aug 2021];17(6):291-6. doi:10.1053/jpnu.2001.28184
Perkins GH, Slowik AJ. The value of research in academic libraries. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2013 Mar [cited 31 Aug 2021];74(2):143-58. doi:10.5860/crl-308
Booth A. Bridging the research-practice gap? The role of evidence based librarianship. New Rev Inf Libr Res [Internet]. 2003 Jul [cited 31 Aug 2021];9(1):3-23. doi:10.1080/13614550410001687909
Hansman CA. Training librarians as qualitative researchers: developing skills and knowledge. Ref Librar [Internet]. 2015 Oct [cited 31 Aug 2021];56(4):274-94. doi:10.1080/02763877.2015.1057683
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Jenessa McElfresh, Maggie Albro, K. Megan Sheffield
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All works in Hypothesis are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in Hypothesis. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author(s) and the Medical Library Association are acknowledged in the copy, and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes. For any other use of articles, please contact the copyright owner(s).