Predicting NCAA Division I Football Conference Winning Percentage
An Applied Resource Allocation Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/28843Keywords:
NCAA, Football Bowl Subdivision, FBS, competitive balance, college football, intercollegiate athleticsAbstract
Applied strategies to improve conference wins for NCAA Division I FBS football teams could have implications for increased resource acquisition, bowl berths, or inclusion in the lucrative college football playoffs. Unfortunately, aggregated research is lacking that identifies how administrators might prioritize such efforts, so that they may allocate their scarce resources to the most impactful areas. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate variables likely to impact conference winning percentage to provide practical insight for leaders embracing their role within managerial capitalism. Pearson correlations and multilinear OLS were applied to determine which descriptive, financial, and performance variables predict conference winning percentage. Football expenditures as well as coach success, recruit quality, and power conference membership were significantly predictive. Application of these results suggest conference winning percentage would likely increase as a result of targeted financial development leading to investments in recruiting and football expenditures, particularly in the power conferences.
References
Akabas, L., & Novy-Williams, E. (2024, January 23). Athletic department donations up despite rise of NIL collectives. Sportico.com. https://www.sportico.com/leagues/college-sports/2024/college-sports-donations-nil-money-1234763721/
Anderson, M. L. (2017). The benefits of college athletic success: An application of the propensity score design. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(1), 119–134.
Atwater, C., Corr, C., & Whelan, C. (2023). Organizational replication and spending patterns among FBS football and Division I basketball programs. International Journal of Sport & Society, 14(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v14i01/105-125
Baumer, B., & Zimbalist, A, (2019). The impact of college athletic success on donations and application quality. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs7020019
Bergman, S. A., & Logan, T. D. (2020). Revenue per quality of college football recruit. Journal of Sports Economics, 21(6), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002520921223
Caro, C. (2023). The inequalities of college football: Quantifying the economic and recruiting disparities in Division One FBS football. International Journal of Sport & Society, 14(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v14i02/1-23
Cox, K. (2024). Exploring key antirust implications of conference consolidation in college football. Missouri Law Review, 89(2), 567–613.
Dees, W., Walsh, P., McEvoy, C., & McKelvey, S. (2022). Sport marketing (5th edition). Human Kinetics.
Downs, B., & Seifried, C. (2023). Modernization and the contemporary sport stadium. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 15(4), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.7290/jasm-2023-V15-I4-rsud
Elliott, K., & Williams, T. A. (2024). A perception of revenue generation strategies in HBCU athletic departments. Sports Innovation Journal, 5(1), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.18060/28421
Fullagar, H. H. K., Delaney, J., Duffield, R., & Murray, A. (2019). Factors influencing home advantage in American collegiate football. Science and Medicine in Football, 3(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2018.1524581
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction of varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of cap-italism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–70). Oxford University Press.
Hill, W. W., & Qu, Y. (2019). College football performance and athletic department revenues: The power of winning tradition. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 13(2), 31-41 https://articlearchives.co/index.php/JMDC/article/view/4528
Huml, M. R., Pifer, N. D., Towle, C., & Rode, C. R. (2018). If we build it, will they come? The effect of new athletic facilities on recruiting rankings for power five football and men’s basketball programs. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 29(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1478924
Humphreys, B. R., & Mondello, M. (2007). Intercollegiate athletic success and donations at NCAA Division I institutions. Journal of Sport Management, 21(2), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.21.2.265
Jablonski, T., Jensen, J. A., Popp, N., & Bates, B. (2022). Identifying and analyzing determinants of allocated revenue to NCAA FBS athletic departments. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 15(1), 506–531. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/jiia/vol15/iss1/17
Kaburakis, A. (2022). The winds of NCAA change: Navigating the unknown in college athletics
governance. Sports Innovation Journal, 3(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.18060/26482
Levy, J. (2021). Ages of American capitalism: A history of the United States. Random House.
Runkel, M. (2022). Player mobility and competitive balance regulation in professional sports leagues. Journal of Sports Economics, 23(4), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/15270025211059526
Soebbing, B. P., Seifried, C. S., & Tutka, P. (2022). If you rebuild it, will they come? The impact of renovated sports facilities on total revenue and attendance. Journal of Sport Management, 37(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2022-0101
Stinson, J. L., & Howard, D. R. (2007). Athletic success and private giving to athletic and academic programs at NCAA institutions. Journal of Sport Management, 21(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.21.2.235
Wanless, L., & Stinson, J. L. (2020). A contemporary functional form for NCAA Division I FBS contributions: Internal and external considerations. Journal of Sport Management, 34(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2019-0036
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-09-16 (2)
- 2025-09-07 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 James E. Johnson, Benjamin J. Downs, Zachary C. T. Evans, Megan Donahue, Davis Matz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright to articles published in Sport Innovation Journal is retained by the author(s).