Beyond the Conference: Health Sciences Librarians’ Motivations for Publishing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/26618Keywords:
Conferences, Publishing, Motivational theory, Intrinsic motivationAbstract
Introduction: Previous studies have found that only 21.8% to 28% of abstracts presented at the annual Medical Library Association (MLA) conferences are later published as journal articles. What motivates health sciences librarians to take the next step in publishing and disseminating their work? This study will answer the following questions: 1) Are librarians presenting at MLA conferences more motivated to publish due to internal motivational factors (e.g., “to build a professional reputation for myself”), external motivational factors (e.g., “I am expected to participate in research for my job”), or a mix of both? 2) Do motivations for publication differ between academic and hospital librarians? 3) Do motivations for publication differ between those who published in peer-reviewed journals and those who published in other venues?
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the team surveyed first authors of abstracts presented at the MLA conferences in 2012 and 2014 to determine if they later published their work in any full-text format. If they did publish, the team asked authors where their work was published and the primary and secondary reasons for pursuing publication. The reasons for publication included internal and external motivational factors identified from the library science literature. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in motivation.
Results: One hundred and sixty one authors responded to the survey, and of these, 49 authors reported that they had published their abstract(s). Fifty-one percent (n=25) of respondents selected only internal motivational factors, 18.4% (n=9) selected only external motivational factors, and 30.6% (n=15) reported a mix of both. The author found no statistically significant differences between hospital and academic librarians, or those who published in peer-reviewed journals versus other venues.
Discussion: Findings indicate that librarians who chose to publish their work after presenting at annual MLA conferences are primarily motivated to publish due to internal factors. Interventions designed to encourage MLA presenters to publish their work should consider ways to cultivate presenters’ internal motivation.
References
Fennewald J. Perished or published: the fate of presentations from the ninth ACRL conference. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2005;66(6):517–26. Available from: http://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/15760
Light A, Dadabhoy M, Burrows A, Nandakumar M, Gupta T, Karthikeyan S, et al. Publication fate of abstracts presented at four British surgical meetings: an 11-year follow-up. J Surg Res [Internet]. 2019 Feb;234:139–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.047
Shue S, Warden S. Full-text publication of abstract-presented work in sport and exercise psychology. BMJ Open Sport Exerc [Internet]. 2018 Mar 1;4(1):e000344. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000344
Drott MC. Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol [Internet]. 1995;46:299–305. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199505)46:4<299::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-0
Neves J, Lavis JN, Ranson MK. A scoping review about conference objectives and evaluative practices: how do we get more out of them? Health Res Policy Sys [Internet]. 2012 Aug 2;10(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-26
Shaw CE, Szwajcer AL. Publication rate of presentation abstracts presented at the Canadian Health Libraries Association (CHLA/ABSC) annual meetings from 2004-2009. Performance Measurement Metric [Internet]. 2016 Nov 14;17(3):252–62. doi: 10.1108/PMM-07-2016-0034
Scherer RW, Meerpohl JJ, Pfeifer N, Schmucker C, Schwarzer G, Elm E von. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2018;(11):1-562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4
Harvey SA, Wandersee JR. Publication rate of abstracts of papers and posters presented at Medical Library Association annual meetings. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2010 Jul;98(3):250–5. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.014
Hinrichs RJ, Ramirez M, Ameen M. The publication fate of abstracts presented at the Medical Library Association conferences. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2021 Oct;109(4):590–8. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1220
Kennedy MR, Brancolini KR, Kennedy DP. An exploratory study of accomplished librarian-researchers. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract [Internet]. 2020 Mar 12;15(1):179–217. doi: 10.18438/eblip29655
Hoffmann K, Berg SA, Koufogiannakis D. Examining success: identifying factors that contribute to research productivity across librarianship and other disciplines. LIR [Internet]. 2014;38(119):13–28. doi: 10.29173/lirg639
Hoffmann K, Berg S, Koufogiannakis D. Understanding factors that encourage research productivity in academic librarians. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract [Internet]. 2017;12(4):102. doi: 10.18438/B8G66F
Hoffmann K, Berg SA, Brancolini KR, Kennedy MR. Complex and varied: factors related to the research productivity of academic librarians in the United States. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2023. Accepted for publication. Available from https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/librarian_pubs/141/
Bullion JW, Brower SM. Enhancing the research and publication efforts of health sciences librarians via an academic writing retreat. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2017;105(4):394–9. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.320
Sullivan D, Leong J, Yee A, Giddens D, Phillips R. Getting published: group support for academic librarians. Library Management [Internet]. 2013;34(8/9):704. doi: 10.1108/LM-03-2013-0026
Schmidt L, Boczar J, Lewis B, Taylor T. Increasing scholarly productivity: developing an in-house academic librarian support network. Journal of Academic Librarianship [Internet]. 2021;47(5):1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102385
Stark RK, McElfresh J. A recipe for success: personal research network development and maintenance for solo medical librarians. J Hosp Librariansh [Internet]. 2021;21(2):130–40. doi: 10.1080/15323269.2021.1899795
Gill M, Gosine-Boodoo M. A case for purposeful mentorship in research and publishing at a Caribbean academic library. Journal of Academic Librarianship [Internet]. 2021;47(2):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102302
Eldredge JD, Phillips HE, Kroth PJ. Real-time peer review: an innovative feature to an evidence-based practice conference. Med Ref Serv Q [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Nov 3];32(4):412–23. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2013.837690
Yusuf F. Mentoring and its impact on the publication output of librarians in selected academic libraries in south-west Nigeria. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science [Internet]. 2011;21(2):113–20. Available from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajlais/article/view/106592
Agboola AT, Oduwole AA. Staff seminars and publications productivity: a study of academic librarians in Ogun State, Nigeria. Library Management [Internet]. 2005;26(8/9):478–86. doi: 10.1108/01435120510631765
Philbrick J, Kloda L, Lessick S. Research Training Institute (RTI) assessment results two years after: building a research support system for health sciences librarian-researchers [Internet]. Medical Library Association Conference; 2020; Virtual. Available from https://www.mlanet.org/d/do/18173
Luo L, Kennedy M. Institute for Research Design in Librarianship: impact on information literacy research and practice. In: Information literacy: key to an inclusive society [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 439–46. (Communications in Computer and Information Science). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_44
Neville TM, Henry DB. Support for research and service in Florida academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship [Internet]. 2007;33(1):76–93. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.003
Crampsie C, Neville T, Henry D. Academic librarian publishing productivity: an analysis of skills and behaviors leading to success. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2020;81(2):248–71. doi: 10.5860/crl.81.2.248
Fennewald J. Research productivity among librarians: factors leading to publications at Penn State. Coll Res Libr [Internet]. 2008;69(2):104–16. doi: 10.5860/crl.69.2.104
Walters WH. The faculty subculture, the librarian subculture, and librarians’ scholarly productivity. portal: Libraries and the Academy [Internet]. 2016;16(4):817–43. doi: 10.1353/pla.2016.0054
Lessick S, Perryman C, Billman BL, Alpi KM, De Groote SL, Babin Jr TD. Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2016;104(2):166–73. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.015
Campbell S, Hatch K, Torabi N. Identifying research support needs of members of the Canadian Health Libraries Association. J Can Health Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2018;39(1):3–15. doi: 10.29173/jchla29354
Hollister CV. An exploratory study on post-tenure research productivity among academic librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship [Internet]. 2016;42(4):368–81. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2016.04.021
O’Brien T, Cronin K. Research output of academic librarians from Irish higher education institutions 2000–2015: findings from a review, analysis, and survey. New Review of Academic Librarianship [Internet]. 2016;22(2–3):203–24. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2016.1181666
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol [Internet]. 2000;55(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Deci E, Ryan R. The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol [Internet]. 1987;53:1024–37. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1024
Hardre PL, Beesley AD, Miller RL, Pace TM. Faculty motivation to do research: across disciplines in research-extensive universities. The Journal of the Professoriate [Internet]. 2011;5(1):35–69. Available from https://caarpweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/5-1_Hardre_p.35.pdf
Zhou T, Law R, Lee PC. “What motivates me?” motivation to conduct research of academics in teaching-oriented universities in China. J Hosp Leis Sport Tour Educ [Internet]. 2022;31:100392. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100392
Esdar W, Gorges J, Wild E. The role of basic need satisfaction for junior academics’ goal conflicts and teaching motivation. Higher Education [Internet]. 2016;72(2):175–90. Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24756976
Peng JE, Gao X (Andy). Understanding TEFL academics’ research motivation and its relations with research productivity. SAGE Open [Internet]. 2019;9(3):1–13. doi: 10.1177/2158244019866295
Lechuga VM, Lechuga DC. Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self-determination and self-regulation perspectives. The Journal of the Professoriate [Internet]. 6(2):59–97. Available from https://caarpweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/6-2_Lechuga_p.59v2.pdf
Leech NL, Haug CA. The research motivation scale: validation with faculty from American schools of education. International Journal for Researcher Development [Internet]. 2016 Jan 1;7(1):30–45. doi: 10.1108/IJRD-02-2015-0005
Meetings: Past and Future Meetings [Internet]. Medical Library Association. Available from https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=56
Eldredge JD, Ascher MT, Holmes HN, Harris MR. The new Medical Library Association research agenda: final results from a three-phase delphi study. J Med Libr Assoc [Internet]. 2012;100(3):214–8. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.3.012
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rachel J. Hinrichs
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All works in Hypothesis are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Authors own copyright of their articles appearing in Hypothesis. Readers may copy articles without permission of the copyright owner(s), as long as the author(s) and the Medical Library Association are acknowledged in the copy, and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes. For any other use of articles, please contact the copyright owner(s).
