Place-Based School Reform as Method of Creating Shared Urban Spaces: What is It, and What Does it Mean for Universities?

  • D. Gavin Luter Wisconsin Campus Compact
Keywords: School reform, University community partnership, Neighborhoods, Social inequality, Community schools.

Abstract

In this article, a layered conceptual framework for “place-based school reform” is presented as a way to link the concept of school reform and neighborhood development. Because many universities have been involved in community-school-university partnerships, the university community engagement literature will be connected to this increasingly attractive concept that seeks to both improve academic outcomes and to link a schooling system to a neighborhood. Implications for universities seeking to co-create urban shared spaces are discussed.  

Author Biography

D. Gavin Luter, Wisconsin Campus Compact

Dr. Gavin Luter is Executive Director of Wisconsin Campus Compact. In this role, his practitioner/scholar identity comes to life as he works with faculty, staff, and students to advance the civic mission of higher education.  Gavin's research has been dedicated to studying and creating models for linking school improvement, neighborhood development, and higher education reform.  His forthcoming publications in the Community Schools Journal and in the book Exploring the Community Impact of Research-Practice Partnerships in Education examine the university-assisted community schools model implementation in Knoxville, TN.  

References

The Aspen Institute. (1997). Voices from the field: Learning from the early work of comprehensive community initiatives. Retrieved online at http://www.instituteccd.org/uploads/iccd/documents/voices_from_the_field.pdf.

The Aspen Institute. (2002). Voices from the field II: Reflections on comprehensive community change. Retrieved online at http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/rcc/voicesIIbook.pdf.

The Aspen Institute (2011). Voices from the field III: Reflections on comprehensive community change. Retrieved online at http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/images/rcc/VoicesfromtheFieldIII.pdf.

Austin, M. J., Lemon, K. & Leer, E. (2006). Promising practices for meeting the multiple needs of low-income families in poverty neighborhoods. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 21(1), 95-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j045v21n01_04.

Benson, L., Harkavy, I. & Puckett, J. L. (2007). Dewey's dream: Universities and democracies in an age of education reform: Civil society, public schools, and democratic citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Bertrand, M. & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 991-1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561.

Black, D. W. (2010). The Congressional failure to enforce equal protection through the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Boston University Law Review, 90, 314-373.

Borman, G. D. (2005). National efforts to bring reform to scale in high-poverty schools: Outcomes and implications. Review of Research in Education, 29, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732x029001001.

Borman, G. D., Hewes G., Overman, L., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543073002125.

Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.

Brighouse, H. & Schouten, G. (2011). Understanding the context for existing reform and research proposals. In G. J. Duncan, & R. J. Murnane, (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances (pp. 507-522). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Chaskin, R. J. (1997). Perspectives on neighborhood and community: a review of the literature. The Social Service Review, 71(4), 521-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/604277.

Chung, C. (2002). Using public schools as community-development tools: Strategies for community-based developers. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.

Clinch, R. (2009). The workforce supply and demand characteristics of the East Baltimore Development Inc. redevelopment effort. Baltimore, MD: The University of Baltimore. Retrieved online at http://www.jacob-france-institute.org/documents/EBDI-Workforce-Report-final-06-03.pdf.

Crowder, K., & South, S. J. (2003). Neighborhood distress and school dropout: The variable significance of community context. Social Science Research, 32(4), 659-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0049-089x(03)00035-8.

Dryfoos, J. (1994). Full service schools: A revolution for health and social services for children, youth, and families. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2013, April). Boosting family income to promote child development. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association’s annual meeting. San Francisco, CA.

Duncan, G. J. & Murnane, R. J. (2014). Restoring opportunity: The crisis of inequality and the challenge for American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1993). Entry into school: The beginning school transition and educational stratification in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 401-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.002153.

Etienne, H. F. (2012). Pushing back the gates: Neighborhood perspectives on university driven revitalization in West Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Furco, A. (2002). Self-assessment rubric for the institutionalization of service-learning in higher education. Providence, RI: Campus Compact. Retrieved online from http://talloiresnetwork.tufts.edu/wp-content/uploads/Self-AssessmentRubricfortheInstitutionalizationofService-LearninginHigherEducation.pdf.

Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463.

Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. New York: Russell Sage.

Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching. Education Next, 2(1), 50-55.

Goodlad, J. I. (1993). School–university partnerships and partner schools. Educational Policy, 7(1), 24–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904893007001003.

Gordon-Larsen, P., Nelson, M. C., Page, P., & Popkin, B. M. (2006). Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics, 117(2), 417-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-0058.

Grim, J., & Officer, S. (2010). George Washington Community High School: A community–university partnership success story. Universities and Community Schools, 8(1–2), 55–62.

Harkavy, I. (1998). School-community-university partnerships: Effectively integrating community building and education reform. Paper presented at the Connecting Community Building and Education Reform: Effective School, Community, University Partnerships, Washington, DC, January 1998.

Harkavy, I. & Zuckerman, H. (1999). Eds and meds: Cities’ hidden assets. The Brookings Institution Survey Series, 22. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.

Harper, W. R. (1898). The university and democracy. Cosmopolitan, 25, 681-691.

Hauser, R. M. (1970). Educational stratification in the United States. Sociological Inquiry, 40(2), 102-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1970.tb01004.x.

Hodges, R. A. & Dubb, S. (2012). The road half traveled: University engagement at a crossroads. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.

Hudson, E. (2013). Educating for community change: Higher education’s proposed role in community transformation through the federal Promise Neighborhood policy. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(3), 109-138.

Institute for Competitive Inner Cities & CEOs for Cities (2002). Leveraging colleges and universities for urban economic revitalization: An action agenda. Boston, MA: Institute for Competitive Inner Cities.

Jargowsky, P. A. (2005). Stunning progress, hidden problems. In A. Berube, B. Katz, & R. E. Lang (Eds.) Redefining urban and suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000 (pp. 137-171). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Jennings, J. (2012). Measuring neighborhood distress: a tool for place-based urban revitalization strategies. Community Development, 43(4), 464-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.645047.

Johnson Jr, O. D. (2012). Toward a theory of place: social mobility, proximity, and proximal capital. In W. F. Tate IV (Ed.), Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities: Toward civic responsibility (pp. 29-46). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.

Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226.

Kao, G., & Thompson, J. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100019.

Kasarda, J. D. (1993). Inner‐city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate, 4(3), 253-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1993.9521135.

Kellogg Commission on the Future of State, Land-Grant Universities, National Association of State Universities, and Land-Grant Colleges (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. Retrieved from http://www.aplu.org/library/returning-to-our-roots-the-engaged-institution/file.

Khadduri, J., Schwartz, H., & Turnham, J. (2008). Policy roadmap for expanding school-centered community revitalization. Columbia, Maryland: Enterprise Community Partners. Retrieved from http://www.abtassoc.net/reports/66901.pdf.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kronick, R. F. (2005). Full service community schools: Prevention of delinquency in students with mental illness and/or poverty. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.

Lawson, H. A., & Briar-Lawson, K. (1997). Connecting the dots: Progress toward the integration of school reform, school, linked services, parent involvement, and community schools.

Unpublished manuscript. Oxford, OH: Miami University, The Danforth Foundation, and the Institute for Educational Renewal. (ERIC No. ED 409 696).

Lewis, K. & Burd-Sharps, S. (2013). Halve the gap: Youth disconnection in America’s cities. Brooklyn, NY: Measure of America, A Project of the Social Science Research Council. Retrieved from http://ssrc-static.s3.amazonaws.com/moa/MOA-Halve-the-Gap-ALL-10.25.13.pdf.

Luter (2015). Promise Neighborhood implementation in the context of school choice: Tensions and contradictions. Retrieved from ProQuest Database (3725951).

Maclennan, D. (2013). Neighbourhoods: Evolving ideas, evidence and changing policies. In D. Manley, M. van Ham, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects or neighbourhood based problems? A policy context (pp. 269-292). Dordrecht: Springer.

Miller, P., Wills, N., & Scanlan, M. (2013). Educational leadership on the social frontier: Developing Promise Neighborhoods in urban and tribal settings. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(4), 543-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161x12471531.

Netter Center for Community Partnerships (2008). Anchor institutions toolkit. University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.upenn.edu/ccp/anchortoolkit/.

Noguera, P. A. (2011). A broader and bolder approach uses education to break the cycle of poverty Making bold assertions that all children can achieve while doing nothing to address the challenges they face is neither fair nor sound public policy. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(3), 8-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003172171109300303.

O’Hare, W. & Mather, M. (2003). The growing number of kids in severely distressed neighborhoods: Evidence from the 2000 Census. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation and Population Reference Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.prb.org/pdf/KidsDistressedNeighborhoods.pdf.

Olson, L. S. (2014). A first look at community schools in Baltimore. Baltimore Education Research Consortium. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/time_and_learning/CommunitySchoolsReportDec2014.pdf.

Patterson, K. L. & Silverman, R. M. (2013). Schools and urban revitalization: Rethinking institutions and community development. New York: Routledge.

Porter, M. (2010). Anchor institutions and urban economic development: From community benefit to shared value. Presentation from Inner City Economic Forum Summit 2010, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.icic.org/ee_uploads/publications/Anchor-Institutions.PDF.

Potapchuk, W. R. (2013). The role of community schools in place-based initiatives: Collaborating for student success. Washington, DC: Coalition for Community Schools, PolicyLink, Institute for Educational Leadership, and West Coast Collaborative. Retrieved from http://www.communityschools.org/assets/1/AssetManager/The%20Role%20of%20Community%20Schools%20in%20Place-Based%20InitiativesFINAL1.pdf.

Renee, M., Welner, K., & Oakes, J. (2010). Social movement organizing and equity-focused educational change: Shifting the zone of mediation. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 153-168). Springer Netherlands.

Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.

Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

Roy, K. & Jones, N. (2014). Pathways to adulthood for disconnected young men in low-income communities. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 143. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40894-015-0009-5.

Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.

Sampson, R. J., Sharkey, P., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2008). Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African-American children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 845-852.

Say Yes to Education (2012). Partnerships for increasing urban education, social, health, and economic development outcomes: Guidebook for implementing the Say Yes city-wide turnaround strategy. Unpublished manuscript, last modified June 7, 2013. Microsoft Word file.

Sharff, J. (1987). The underground economy of a poor neighborhood. In L. Mullings (Ed.), Cities of the United States: Studies in urban anthropology (pp. 19-50). New York: Columbia University Press.

Sharkey, P. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Sharkey, P. (2010). The acute effect of local homicides on children's cognitive performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(26), 11733-11738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812709106.

Shirley, Dennis. 1997. Community organizing for urban school reform. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Sirianni, C. (2007). Neighborhood planning as collaborative democratic design: The case of Seattle. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(4), 373-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944360708978519.

Slavin, R. E. (2008). Comprehensive school reform. In T. L. Good (ed.) 21st century education: A reference handbook, Volume 2 (pp. 259-266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sutton, S. E., & Kemp, S. P. (2002). Children as partners in neighborhood placemaking: lessons from intergenerational design charrettes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1), 171-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0251.

Taylor, H. L. (2011). The historical roots of the crisis in housing affordability: The case of Northeaston, New York. In R. M. Silverman & K. L. Patterson (Eds.), Fair and affordable housing in the US: Trends, outcomes, future directions (pp. 245–276). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.

Taylor, H. L. (2005). Connecting community development and urban school reform. In L. Johnson, M. E. Finn, & R. Lewis (eds.) Urban education with an attitude (pp. 41-57). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Taylor, H. T. & Luter, D. G. (2013). Anchor institutions: An interpretive review essay. A report by the Anchor Institutions Task Force (AITF). New York, NY: Marga, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.margainc.com/files_images/general/Literature_Review_2013.pdf.

Taylor, H. L., McGlynn, L., & Luter, D. G. (2013). Neighborhoods matter: The role of universities in the school reform neighborhood development movement. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(5), 541-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2013.834793.

US Department of Housing and Urban Development (2014). Choice Neighborhoods Promising Practices Practice Guides, Issue Brief #2. Retrieved online at https://www.seattleu.edu/media/youth-initiative/files/results/impact/Choiece-Neigborhood-Issue-Brief---Improving-Schools.pdf.

Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Polity Press: Malden, MA.

Weis, L. (1990). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608375.n20.

Williams, C. C., & Windebank, J. (2001). The growth of urban informal economies. In R. Pattison (Ed.), Handbook of Urban Studies (pp. 308-322) London: Sage.

Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Wilson, W. J., & Taub, R. P. (2011). There goes the neighborhood: Racial, ethnic, and class tensions in four Chicago neighborhoods and their meaning for America. New York: Random House. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01022_5.x.

Yamamura, E. M. (2014). Developing the next generation of university-community engagement initiatives: Promising practices and lessons learned from the Seattle University Youth Initiative. Retrieved online at https://www.seattleu.edu/media/youth-initiative/files/results/impact/SUYI-White-Paper-June-2014-PDF.pdf.

Published
2016-11-16