Community Engagement vs. Racial Equity

Can Community Engagement Work be Racially Equitable?

  • Arien B. Telles University of Minnesota
Keywords: institutional transformation, engaged institutions, critical analysis, educational equity


The literature on the transformation of higher education institutions into engaged institutions identifies the great potential this transformation can have on higher education’s ability to address pressing social issues. However, engagement work frequently operates in White racialized spaces and within systems that perpetuate racial oppression. A lack of critical reflection on this phenomenon may lead to racially inequitable or racially exclusive institutional transformation. If an understanding of racial equity work within community engagement does not occur, we run the risk that the transformation into engaged institutions will include some and not others, and those decisions will likely fall along racial lines. The purpose of this article is to identify and discuss four key findings based on a critical analysis of the ways in which the literature on transformation via engagement addresses issues of racial equity. The analysis leads to a discussion of the implications of the lack of connection between racial equity and community engagement. Most importantly, the overarching question of my own future research in this area is not if there is racial equity work taking place in community engagement initiatives, but how racial equity work is done in community engagement initiatives.

Author Biography

Arien B. Telles, University of Minnesota

Arien B. Telles is a Ph.D. candidate of higher education at the University of Minnesota in the Department of Organization Leadership, Policy and Development. Her research interests include community engagement, engaged scholarship, equitable institutional practices, and issues of racial equity and racialized spaces within the context of higher education. She is currently working on a dissertation that focuses on the ways in which community engagement addresses issues of racial equity.

Arien B. Telles
Department of Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development
University of Minnesota
206 Burton Hall
178 Pleasant St. SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Telephone: 651-308-7991


Alter, T. R., & Book, P. A. (2002). The engaged university: Reorganizing to serve the public good. Metropolitan Universities, 12(3), 30-40. Retrieved from

Barajas, H. L., & Ronnkvist, A. (2007). Racialized space: Framing Latino and Latina experiences in public schools. Teachers College Record, 109(6), 1517-1538. Retrieved from

Blanchard, L. W., Hanssmann, C., Strauss, R. P., Belliard, J. C., Krichbaum, K., Waters, E., & Seifer, S. D. (2009). Models for faculty development: What does it take to be a community-engaged scholar? Metropolitan Universities, 20(2), 47-65. Retrieved from

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. New York, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Bridger, J. C., & Alter, T. R. (2006). The engaged university, community development, and public scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 11(1), 163-178. Retrieved from

Butler, J. E. (1990). Retention and recruitment of minority faculty: Defeating the Sisyphean syndrome. Metropolitan Universities, 1(4), 65-73. Retrieved from

Cantor, N., Englot, P., & Higgins, M. (2013). Making the work of anchor institutions stick: Building coalitions and collective expertise. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(3), 17-46. Retrieved from

Checkoway, B. (1997). Strengthening service as scholarship in the research university. Metropolitan Universities, 8(1), 51-60. Retrieved from

Cherwitz, R. (2010). The challenge of creating engaged public research universities. Planning for Higher Education, 38(4), 61-64. Retrieved from

Cortes, C. E. (1999). Building community from communities: Diversity and the future of higher education. Metropolitan Universities, 9(4), 11-18. Retrieved from

Dowd, A. C., & Bensimon, E. M. (2015). Engaging the “race question”: Accountability and equity in US higher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Edwards, T. & Montague, D. R. (2014). The university’s role in advancing race relations: Reflections from the community. Metropolitan Universities, 25(1), 165-178. Retrieved from

Feagin, J. R. (2006). Systemic Racism: A Theory of Oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.

Fear, F. A., Sandmann, L. R., & Lelle, M. A. (1998). First generation outcomes of the outreach movement: Many voices, multiple paths. Metropolitan Universities, 9(3), 83-91. Retrieved from

Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2012). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement,, 16(3), 7-27. Retrieved from

Hernandez, K., & Pasquesi, K. (2017). Critical perspectives and commitments deserving attention from community engagement professionals. In L. D. Dostilio (Ed.), The community engagement professional in higher education: A competency model for an emerging field (pp. 56-78). Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Holland, B. A. (2001). Toward a definition and characterization of engaged campuses: Six cases. Metropolitan Universities, 12(3), 20-29. Retrieved from

Holland, B. A. (2005). Scholarship and mission in the 21st century university: The role of engagement. In Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum (pp. 11-17).

Holland, B. A. (2009). Will it last? Evidence of institutionalization at Carnegie Classified Community Engagement institutions. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 85-98.

Inman, P. (2004). The engaged institution. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 10(2), 135-148. Retrieved from

Jaeger, A. J., Jameson, J. K., & Clayton, P. (2012). Institutionalization of community-engaged scholarship at institutions that are both land-grant and research universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(1), 149-167. Retrieved from

Johnson, R. N. & Wamser, C. C. (1996). Respecting diverse scholarly work: The key to advancing the multiple missions of the urban university. Metropolitan Universities, 7(4), 43-59. Retrieved from

Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Washington, D.C.: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. Retrieved from

King, V. G., Barnes, B., & Hitt, J. C. (1999). Diversity and the metropolitan university: Coming of age in the 21st century. Metropolitan Universities, 9(4), 70-76. Retrieved from

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Moore, W. L. (2008). Reproducing racism: White space, elite law schools, and racial inequality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Lambert-Pennington, K. (2016). Promoting engaged scholars: Matching tenure policy and scholarly practice. Metropolitan Universities, 27(2), 50-58.

Liang, J. G., & Sandmann, L. R. (2015). Leadership for community engagement – A distributed leadership perspective. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(1), 35-63. Retrieved from

O’Meara, K. (2011). Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship: Promotion and tenure. In H. E. Fitzgerald, C. Burack, & S. D. Seifer (Eds.), Handbook of engaged scholarship: Contemporary landscapes, future directions: Vol. 1. Institutional change (pp. 271-294). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.

Ramaley, J. A. (1996). Large-scale institutional change to implement an urban university mission: Portland State University. Journal of Urban Affairs, 18(2), 139-151.

Ramaley, J. A. (2002). Moving Mountains: Institutional culture and transformational change. In R. M. Diamond & B. Adam (Eds.), Field guide to academic leadership (pp. 59-73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ramaley, J. A. (2009). Community-engaged scholarship in higher education: An expanding experience. Metropolitan Universities, 20(2), 139-153. Retrieved from

Ramaley, J. A. (2014). The changing role of higher education: Learning to deal with wicked problems. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(3), 7-22. Retrieved from

Rosean, C. L., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Fear, F. A. (2001). The citizen scholar: Joining voices and values in the engagement interface. Metropolitan Universities, 12(4), 10-29. . Retrieved from

Saltmarsh, J. & Wooding, J. (2016). Rewarding community-engaged scholarship: A state university system approach. Metropolitan Universities, 27(2), 74-86.

Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Conceptualization of the scholarship of engagement in higher education: A strategic review, 1996-2006. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(1), 91-104. Retrieved from

Sandmann, L. R., Jordan, J. W., Mull, C. D. & Valentine, T. (2014). Measuring boundary-spanning behaviors in community engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(3), 83-104. Retrieved from

Sandmann, L. R., & Plater, W. M. (2009). Leading the engaged institution. New Directions for Higher Education, 147, 13-24.

Simpson, J. S. (2014). Longing for justice: Higher education and democracy’s agenda. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Spanier, G. B. (2011). Renewing the covenant: Ten years after the Kellogg Commission. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(3), 9-13. Retrieved from

Strum, S., Eatman, T., Saltmarsh, J., & Bush, A. (2011). Full participation: Building the architecture for diversity and community engagement in higher education (White paper). Columbia University Law School: Center for Institutional and Social Change. Retrieved from

Turner, C. S. V. (2003). Incorporation and marginalization in the academy: From border toward center for faculty of color? Journal of Black Studies, 34(1), 112-125.