Scholar-Administrators as Change Agents

  • Emily M. Janke University of North Carolina Greensboro
Keywords: social change, society, college administration, higher education, scholarship, scholar-administrator, leadership


Flexibility and readiness to change are not necessarily valued or recognized traits in higher education. Yet higher education is in a period of dramatic change, because of rapid change in scholarship and society. With this change in mind, I reflect here on the role and effect of scholar-administrators as agents of change.

Author Biography

Emily M. Janke, University of North Carolina Greensboro

Emily M. Janke, Ph.D. is director of the Institute for Community and Economic Engagement (ICEE) and an associate professor in the Peace and Conflict Studies department at UNC Greensboro. As the Director of ICEE, Emily leads and supports initiatives that encourage, support, elevate, and amplify faculty, staff, student, and community colleague community-engaged teaching, learning, research, creative activity, and service. Emily’s scholar-administrative work addresses multiple aspects of community engagement focused on community-university partnerships, and institutional culture and change strategies. In particular, she focuses on tracking and measuring community engagement and public service within and across institutions of higher education, the recognition of community-engaged scholarship in reappointment, promotion and tenure policies; the role of conflict management and transformation in community-university partnerships; institutional support for community engagement; innovations in scholarly communications; and reciprocity, collaborative communication, and restorative practices as aspects of high quality, ethical community engagement.

Emily was the recipient of the inaugural Barbara A. Holland Scholar-Administrator Award in 2018.

Emily M. Janke
Institute for Community & Economic Engagement
UNC Greensboro
1111 Spring Garden Street
Greensboro, NC 27412
Telephone: (336) 256-2578


Aguinis, H., Shapiro, D., Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Cummings, T. (2014). Scholarly impact: A pluralistic conceptualization. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13(4), 623–639.

Alperin, J. P. Muñoz Nieves, C., Niles, M., Schimanski, L. A., Fischman, G. E., Niles, M., & McKiernan, E. (2019). How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion, and tenure documents? eLife. Preprint.

Argyris, C., & Schön, D.(1995). Organizational learning: Theory, method and practice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.

Ball, C., Barrett, K., Berkery, P., Clemons, J., Crosby, S., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., & Konkiel, S. (2017). Promotion & Tenure Reform Workgroup report: Promoting openness in professional advancement practices. Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings, 2.

Boyer, E., (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 1(1), 11–20.

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Eatman, T. K. (2012). The arc of the academic career bends toward publicly engaged scholarship. In A. Gilvin, G. M. Roberts & C. Martin (Eds.), Collaborative futures: Critical reflections on publicly active graduate education (pp. 25–48). Syracuse, NY: The Graduate School Press.

Eatman, T. K. (2014). Expanding the continuum of knowledge-making. In Janke, E. M., Medlin, K. B, & Holland, B. A. Honoring the mosaic of talents and stewarding the standards of high quality community-engaged scholarship. Excellence in Community Engagement & Community-Engaged Scholarship (vol. 2). Greensboro: Institute for Community and Economic Engagement, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Geiger, R. (2016). The history of American higher education: Learning and culture from the founding to World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

Holland. B. (2019). Factors influencing faculty engagement. In L. R. Sandmann & D. O. Jones (Eds.). Building the field of higher education: Foundational ideas and future directions (pp. 63–72). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Kania, J., & Kramer M. (2011, Winter). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2011(Winter), 110. Retrieved from

Kezar, A. (2013). How colleges change. New York, NY: Routledge.

Kezar, A. (Ed.). (2012). Embracing non-tenure track faculty: Changing campuses for the new faculty majority. New York, NY: Routledge.

Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (Eds.). (2016). Envisioning the faculty for the twenty-first century: Moving to a mission-oriented and learner-centered model. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.

Kramer, B., & Bosman, J. (2016). Innovations in scholarly communication - global survey on research tool usage [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research, 5.

Kramer, B., & Bosman, J. (2018, January 14). Rainbow of open science practices [digital image]. Zenodo.

Narock, T., Goldstein, E. B., Jackson, C., Bubeck, A., Enright, A., Farquharson, J., … Ampuero, J. P. (in press). Earth science is ready for preprints: The first year of EarthArXiv. Eos. Preprint.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Newport, C. (2016). Deep work: Rules for focused success in a distracted world. London, UK: Hachette.

Ramaley, J. (2017). Facilitating change: Experiences with the reform of STEM education. Retrieved from

Rhoades, G., Kiyama, J. M., McCormick, R., & Quiroz, M. (2008). Local cosmopolitans and cosmopolitan locals: New models of professionals in the academy. The Review of Higher Education, 31(2), 209–235.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Silverman, A. (2019). The multidisciplinary reorganization toolkit: Guidance and resources for transitioning from siloed departments to a collaborative academic governance model. Washington, DC: Educational Advisory Board. Retrieved from

Sturm, S., Eatman, T., Saltmarsh, J., & Bush, A. 2011. Full participation: Building the architecture for diversity and public engagement in higher education [White paper]. New York, NY: Columbia University Law School, Center for Institutional and Social Change.

Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037–2062.

Taylor, H. T., & Luter, G. (2013). Anchor institutions: An interpretive review essay. New York: Anchor Institutions Task Force. Retrieved from

Trower, C. (2006). Gen X meets Theory X: What new scholars want. Journal of Collective Bargaining, 0, Article 11. Retrieved from

Urban Universities for HEALTH. (2015). Faculty cluster hiring for diversity and institutional climate. Retrieved April 12, 2019 from

Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.

Vortruba, J. C., Bailey, J. I., Bergland, B. W., Gonzalez, A., Haynes, K. S., Howard, M. A., ... & Siegel, B. L. (2002). Stepping forward as stewards of place: A guide for leading public engagement at state colleges and universities. Washington, DC: American Association of State Colleges and Universities.

Weerts, D. J. (2011). “If only we told our story better...”: Re-envisioning state-university relations through the lens of public engagement (WISCAPE Viewpoints). Madison: Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education. Retrieved from