A Community-Engaged Approach to Survey Development
Validating an Engagement Outcomes Tool with Community Partners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/29318Abstract
Universities often measure community engagement by institutional outputs, ignoring outcomes relevant to community partners. This stems from a lack of evaluation frameworks that capture diverse partnerships and contexts, which are essential for understanding impact and authentic collaboration. When evaluation is one-sided, it risks misrepresenting impact and marginalizing community perspectives. To shift institutional evaluation policies centered on transactional reporting toward bidirectional impact assessment, investigators from Indiana University Indianapolis (IUI), in Indiana, led the co-creation of a new community engagement evaluation framework. The project engaged 16 faculty, 2 staff members, and 24 community partners through semi-structured interviews and focus-group cognitive interviews (FGCI) to identify relevant engagement outcomes. Centering partners as co-creators challenged existing institutional practices and facilitated a critical shift in the university's valuation of community knowledge. Navigating this change revealed significant disparities between institutional terminology, collaboration categorizations, and partners' lived experiences, necessitating major structural revisions to the evaluation tool before piloting. A key lesson for managing similar realignments of engagement programs is that deep, qualitative stakeholder engagement is vital for successfully transitioning institutional measurement frameworks to reflect authentic collaboration with communities.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Silvia C Garcia, Latosha Rowley, Jim Grim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
