Facilitating Co-Design through Feedback Loops
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/29421Keywords:
co-design, feedback loops, Community-university partnerships, third space, user testing, strategic planningAbstract
Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH) provides nuanced and skilled facilitation to support the third space of community-university partnerships to manage power dynamics and co-create collaborative spaces for productive conversation and problem-solving. CCPH positions the community as the first space, academia as the second space, and the partnership between the two as the third space to advance the partnership. Two case studies explore feedback loops as the generative, reflective, and cyclical mechanism that operates the third space. Feedback loops function differently depending on the context of the partnership dynamic, and these case studies describe feedback loops as user testing to ensure a toolkit satisfies the needs of the end users, and as strategic planning to guide the development of a community-centered leadership course. In community-university partnerships, feedback loops can be used as a tool to disrupt dominant processes for meaning and knowledge making by redefining the power dynamics for cross-sector partnerships, enacting diverse ways of knowing and being, and modeling collaborative practice and transparent communication.
References
brown, adrienne maree. (2021). Holding change: The way of emergent strategy facilitation and mediation. AK Press.
Cannon, C., et al. (2025). Public Health Emergency Preparedness Playbook: Lessons from the RADx-UP COVID-19 Initiative. NIH Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics - Underserved Populations. https://ccphealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/radx-up_playbook_with-appendices_30jun2025_1130pm.pdf
Carless, D. (2018). Feedback loops and the longer-term: Towards feedback spirals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), pp. 705-714. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
CCPH Board of Directors. Position Statement on Authentic Partnerships. Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, 2013.
Community engagement 101: Ultimate beginner’s guide. (n.d.). Visible Network Labs. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://visiblenetworklabs.com/guides/community-engagement-101/#elementor-toc__heading-anchor-0
Contreras Pérez, M. E., et al. (2025). Case study for a research capacity building initiative for community-based organizations. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 18(1), pp. 1-7. DOI: 10.54656/jces.v18i1.628
Dam, R. F., & Siang, T. Y. (2023). Test your prototypes: How to gather feedback and maximize learning. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/test-your-prototypes-how-to-gather-feedback-and-maximise-learning
Finley, E. D., et al. (2025). Development and utilization of the RADx-UP image bank: A digital photography repository. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 19(2), pp. 255-260. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2025.a965364
Girod, K., & Burrowes, K. (2024, July 23). How third spaces contribute to thriving communities. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/how-third-places-contribute-thriving-communities
Jackson, K. T., et al. (2018). Community engagement: Using feedback loops to empower residents and influence systemic change in culturally diverse communities. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 9(2), pp. 1-21. https://www.gjcpp.org/pdfs/2-Jackson,%20Burgess,%20Toms%20_%20Cuthbertson-Final.pdf. DOI: 10.17161/gjcpp.v9i2.20713
McKercher, KA. (2025). What’s co-design? Beyond Sticky Notes. https://www.beyondstickynotes.com/what-is-codesign
Moran, K. (2019, December 1). Usability (user) testing 101. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-testing-101/
Oldenburg, R., & Christensen, K. (2025, March 21). Third spaces, true citizen spaces. UNESCO. https://courier.unesco.org/en/articles/third-places-true-citizen-spaces
Skinner, J. S., et al. (2018). Community experiences and perceptions of clinical and translational research and researchers. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 12(3), pp. 263-271. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0046
Stanlick, S. (2024). Experiential extractivism in service-learning and community engagement: What we take and what we leave behind. Metropolitan Universities, 35(1), pp. 147-166. DOI: 10.18060/27581
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Charisse Iglesias, Paige Castro-Reyes, Kunga Denzongpa, Emily Finley, Alexis Hill, Al Richmond

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
