Behind the Wall
An Exploration of Public Access to Research Articles in Social Work Journals
Abstract
Despite implicit and explicit expectations that research inform their practice, social workers are unlikely to have access to published research articles. The traditional publishing model does not support public access (i.e., no publisher paywall barrier) to scholarly journals. Newer models of publishing allow free access to research including open access publishing and deposit of scholarship in institutional or disciplinary repositories. This study examined public access to articles in the top 25 social work journals. A random sample of article citations from a total of 1,587 was assessed, with the result that 52% of citations had no full-text access. Of the remaining 48% of citations with full-text access, it is questionable most will remain available long term due to possible copyright violations. Citations from the random sample show only minimal usage of institutional or disciplinary repositories as a means of sharing research. Establishing this baseline measure of access to research is an important first step in understanding the barriers for social workers in accessing research to inform practice. Recommendations for increasing access to research include publishing in open access journals and utilizing full text repositories.
References
Advances in Social Work. (n.d.). About the journal. Retrieved from https://advancesinsocialwork.iupui.edu/index.php/advancesinsocialwork/about
Bosch, S., & Henderson, K. (2017, April 19). New world, same model: Periodicals Price Survey 2017. Retrieved from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2017/04/publishing/new-world-same-model-periodicals-price-survey-2017
Bowen, E. A., Mattaini, M. A., & De Groote, S. L. (2013). Open access for social work research and practice. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4(1), 31-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2013.3
Creative Commons. (n.d). Open access: Open access literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/program-areas/open-access
Gray, M., Joy, E., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2013). Implementing evidence-based practice: A review of the empirical research literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(2), 157-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731512467072
Hardisty, D. J., & Haaga, D. A. (2008). Diffusion of treatment research: Does open access matter? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(7), 821-839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20492
Holden, G., Thyer, B. A., Baer, J., Delva, J., Dulmus, C. N., & Shanks, T. W. (2008). Suggestions to improve social work journal editorial and peer-review processes: The San Antonio Response to the Miami Statement. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(1), 66-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507303496
Jamali, H. R. (2017). Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles. Scientometrics, 112(1), 241-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4
Jivanjee, P., Pendell, K., Nissen, L., & Goodluck, C. (2016). Lifelong learning in social work: A qualitative exploration with practitioners, students, and field instructors. Advances in Social Work, 16(2), 260-275. doi: https://doi.org/10.18060/18407
Iovu, M. B., Goian, C., & Runcan, P. L. (2015). Evidence-based practice among Romanian social workers: Attitudes, utilization, and barriers. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 12(5), 524-533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2014.899173
Look, H., & Marsh, K. (2012). Benefits of open access to scholarly
research to the public sector: A report for the Open Access Implementation Group. Retrieved from http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/images/e/e3/Report-to-oauk-benefits-of-open-access-public-sector.pdf
National Association of Social Workers [NASW]. (2017). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
NASW. (n.d.). Social Work Research. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/advocacy/briefing/ResearchBriefingPaper.pdf
NASW Action Network for Social Work Education and Research. (n.d.). Advocacy. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/advocacy/answer/
National Institutes of Health. (2016). NIH public access policy details. Retrieved from: https://publicaccess.nih.gov/policy.htm
Palmer, C. L., Teffeau, L. C., & Newton, M. P. (2008). Identifying factors of success in CIC institutional repository development-final report. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/8981
Schilling, R., Baer, J. C., Barth, R., Fraser, M., Herman, D., Holden, G., Tucker, D. J. (2005). Peer review and publication standards in social work journals: The Miami statement. Social Work Research, 29(2), 119-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/29.2.119
SHERPA/RoMEO. (n.d.). Publisher copyright policies & self-archiving [database]. Retrieved from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php
Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5(632), 1-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3
Van der Zwet, R. J., Weling, J., Beneken genaamd Kolmer, D. M., & Schalk, R. (2017). Exploring MSW students’ and social workers’ orientation toward the evidence-based practice process. Social Work Education, 36(1), 75-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1266321
Van Noorden, R. (2012, June 19). Britain aims for broad open access. Nature, 486(7403), 302-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/486302a
Van Noorden, R. (2017, October 10). Publishers threaten to remove millions of papers from ResearchGate. Nature. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.22793
Willinsky, J. (2003). Policymakers' online use of academic research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(2), 1-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v11n2.2003
Copyright to works published in Advances in Social Work is retained by the author(s).
