Same Problem, Different Policies

A Framework for Examining Social Problem Constructions Over Time

  • Marietta Anne Barretti LIU Post
Keywords: Social problem analysis, policy analysis, social constructionism


Educators teaching policy analysis can choose from many available frameworks, varying in purpose and approach. These frameworks typically advise students to view policies as transient and context-sensitive, but to view the problems activating the policies as objective and static conditions. How problems are variably framed in policy relative to how students are advised to analyze them has not captured the profession’s interest. This article presents 1) an overview of policy analysis frameworks; 2) a summary of findings from a recent study investigating how social policy texts advise students to analyze problems and; 3) a social constructionist framework (matrix) that provides an historical and contextual view of social problems and policy responses. This Problem-to-Policy framework corrects the omissions in most frameworks by including the forces that contributed to a problem’s discovery and construction, while also identifying periods of silence when the problem endured yet faded from view. The author argues that this framework bolsters policy practice by 1) emphasizing those problem frames and contexts that historically led to progressive policies and 2) underscores the urgency for social workers to engage with affected populations in the initial (re)claiming and (re)framing of problems, rather than during the later policy-making stages when constructions have already presaged policy responses.



Almog-Bar, M., Weiss-Gal, I., & Gal, J. (2015). Bringing public policy into policy practice. Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 390-408.


Bacchi, C. (2007). Women, policy and politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Barretti, M. A. (2016). How are social problems viewed and analyzed in social work policy textbooks? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 43(4), 135-160.

Barusch, A. S. (2015). Foundations of social policy: Social justice in human perspective (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

Becker. H. S. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(3), 239-247.


Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. NY: Doubleday Anchor.

Best, J. (1995). Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems. NY: Adline De Gruyter.

Blau, J., & Abramovitz, M. (2014). The dynamics of social welfare policy (4th ed.). NY: Oxford University Press.

Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as a collective behavior. Social Problems, 18(3), 298-306. doi:

Brown, P. (1995). Naming and framing: The social construction of diagnosis and illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35 [extra issue], 34-52.


Brzuzy, S. (1997). Deconstructing disability: The impact of definition. Journal of Poverty, 1(1), 81-91. doi:

Cameron, D. (Ed.). (1990). The feminist critique of language: A reader. NY: Routledge.

Chambers, D. E., & Wedel, K. R. (2005). An overview of a style of policy analysis: A value-critical approach. In Social policy and social programs: A method for the practical public policy analyst (4th ed., pp. 49-90). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Chapin, R. (2014). Social policy for effective practice: A strengths approach (3rd ed.). NY: Routledge. doi:

Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1980). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Cronley, C. (2010). Unraveling the social construction of homelessness. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20, 319-333.


Cummins, L. K., Byers, K. V., & Pedrick, L. (2011). Policy practice for social workers: New strategies for a new era. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Danto, E. A. (2008). Same words, different meanings: Notes toward a typology of postmodern social work education. Social Work Education, 27(7), 710-722.


Davis, L. V. (1987). Battered women: The transformation of a social problem, Social Work 32(4), 306-311. doi:

Dean, R. G. (1993). Constructivism: An approach to clinical practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 63(2), 127-146.


DiNitto, D. M. (2011). Social welfare: Politics and public policy (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

DiNitto, D. M., & Johnson, D. H. (2012). Essentials of social welfare: Politics and public policy. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. NY: Free Press.

Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1990). How theoretical definitions and perspectives affect research and policy. In D. J. Besharov (Ed.), Family violence: Research and public policy issues (pp. 108-129). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

Dybicz, P. (2011). Anything goes? Science and social constructions in competing discourses. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 38(3), 101-122.

Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Empey, L. T., Hay, C. H., & Stafford, M. C. (Eds.). (1999). American delinquency: Its meaning and construction. CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi:

Erchak, G. M., & Rosenfeld, R. (1989). Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and the medicalization of the classroom. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 79-98). NY: Adline De Gruyter.

Faculty Center Network. (2015, May 19). Methodology. Retrieved with permission from

Fagan, J. (1990). Contributions of research to criminal justice policy on wife assault. In D. J. Besharov (Ed.), Family violence: Research and public policy issues (pp. 53-81). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

Garcia, S. E. (2017, October 20). The woman who created #MeToo long before hashtags. The NY Times. Retrieved from

Gelles, R. J. (1993). Family violence. In R. Hampton, T. Gullotta, G. Adams, E. Potter III, & R. Weissberg (Eds.), Family violence: Prevention and treatment (pp. 1-24). Newbury Park: Sage.

Gil, D. G. (1998). Confronting injustice and oppression: Concepts and strategies for social workers. NY: Columbia University Press.

Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (2005). A framework for social welfare policy analysis. In Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy (6th ed., pp. 62-95). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Ginsburg, L., & Miller-Cribbs, J. (2005). Understanding social problems, policies, and programs (4th ed.). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

Gordon, L. (1988). Heroes of their own lives: The politics and history of family violence—Boston, 1880-1960. NY: Viking.

Hardcastle, D. A., Powers, P. R., & Wenocour, S. (2004). Community practice: Theories and skills for social workers (2nd ed.). NY: Oxford University Press.

Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Organizational responses to social policy: The case of welfare reform. Administration in Social Work, 34, 148-167.


Haynes, K. S., & Mickelson, J. S. (2010). Affecting change: Social workers in the political arena (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Heike, K., & Mahoney, C. (2015). Measuring interest group framing strategies in public policy debates. Journal of Public Policy, 35(2), 223-244.


Hernandez, V. R., Montana, S., & Clarke, K. (2010). Child health inequality: Framing a social work response. Health and Social Work, 35(4), 291-301.


Hyde, C. (2000). Feminist approaches to social policy. In J. Midgley, M. Tracey, & M. Livermore (Eds.), The handbook of social policy (pp. 421-435). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Jansson, B. S. (2008). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.

Jansson, B. S. (2014). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (7th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.

Kanenberg, H. (2013). Feminist policy analysis: Expanding traditional social work methods. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(2), 129-142.


Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (2006). American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (2014). American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Kissane, R. (2003). What’s need got to do with it? Barriers to use of nonprofit social services. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30(2), 127-148.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). NY: New American Library.

Laird, J. (Ed.). (1993). Revisioning social work education: A social constructionist approach. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.

Levine, A. (2012). Alcohol use and policy formation: An evolving social problem. Social Work in Public Health, 27(6), 604-615.


Lindblom, C. E. (1980). The policy-making process (2nd ed.). In Prentice Hall foundations of modern political science series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Loseke, D. K. (1995). Writing rights: The homeless mentally ill and involuntary hospitalization. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 261-286). NY: Adline De Gruyter.

McBeth, M. K., Jones, M. D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2014). The narrative policy framework. In P. A. Sabatier, & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 225-266). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

McInnis-Dittrich, K. (1994). Integrating social welfare policy and social work practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.

McPhail, B. (2003). A feminist policy analysis framework: Through a gendered lens. The Social Policy Journal, 2(2/3), 39-61. doi:

McPhee, D. M., & Bronstein, L. (2002). Constructing meaning: Strengthening the policy-practice link. Social Work Education, 21(6), 651-662.


McVinney, L. D. (2004). Epistemology of the bottle: The social construction of alcoholism and alcoholics in social work literature in the United States between 1950 and 1959. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 4(4), 3-35.


Mildred, J. (2003). Claimsmakers in the child sexual abuse “wars”: Who are they and what do they want? Journal of Social Work, 48(4), 492-503.


O’Connor, M. K., & Netting, F. E. (2008). Teaching policy analysis as research: Consideration and extension of options. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(3), 159-172. doi:

Olafson, E., Corwin, D. L., & Summit, R. C. (1993). Modern history of child and sexual abuse awareness: Cycles of discovery and suppression. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17(1), 7-24. doi:

Pal, L. A. (2006). Beyond policy analysis: Public issue management in turbulent times (3rd ed.). Toronto: Thomson/ Nelson.

Patterson, D. A., & Keefe, R. H. (2008). Using social construction theory as a foundation for macro-level interventions in communities impacted by HIV and lessons for economic reform. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 35(2), 111-126.

Pawar, M. (2004). Social policy curricula for training social workers: Towards a model. Australian Social Work, 57, 3-18. doi:

Pfohl, S. (1977). The “discovery” of child abuse. Social Problems (24), 310-320.


Pierce, J., Siddiki, S., Jones, M. D., Schumacher, K., Pattison, A., & Peterson, H. (2014). Social construction and policy design: A review of past applications. Policy Studies Journal, 1, 1-29. doi:

Pleck, E. (2004). Domestic tyranny: The making of American social policy against family violence from colonial times to the present. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Poppendeick, J. E. (1995). Hunger: Typification and response. In J. Sobel & D. Mauer (Eds.), Eating agendas: Food and nutrition as a social problem. NY: Adline De Gruyter.

Popple, P. R., & Leigninger, L. (2015). The policy-based profession: An introduction to social welfare policy analysis for social workers. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Rafter, N. H. (1990). The social construction of crime and crime control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(4), 376-389.


Reinarman, C., & Levine, H. (1995). The crack attack: America’s latest drug scare, 1986-1992. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 261-286). NY: Adline De Gruyter.

Roets, G., Roose, R., DeWilde, L., & Vanobbergen, B. (2017). Framing the ‘child at risk’ in social work reports: Truth-telling or story-telling? Journal of Social Work, 17(4), 453-469. doi:

Sahin, F. (2006). Implications of social constructionism for social work. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work & Development, 16(1), 57-65.


Schneider, J. W. (1978). Deviant drinking as disease: Alcoholism as a social accomplishment. Social Problems, 25, 361-372. doi:

Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 334-347. doi:

Schneider, A. L., Ingram, H., & deLeon, P. (2014). Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 105-149). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Schwartz, W. (1969). Private troubles and public issues: One social work job or two? In Social welfare forum 1969 (pp. 22-43). NY: Columbia University Press.

Segal, E. A. (2013). Social welfare policy and social programs: A values perspective (4th ed). Boston, MA: Cengage.

Shilts, R. (1987). And the band played on. NY: St. Martin Press.

Spector, M., & Kituse, J. I. (2001). Constructing social problems. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Stone, D. A. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. NY: Harper Collins.

Stone, D. A. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision-making (3rd ed.). NY: WW Norton.

Valtonen, K. (2016). Social work and migration: Immigrant and refugee settlement and immigration. London: Routledge.

van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From policy ‘frames’ to ‘framing’: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92-112. doi:

van Sluytman, L. G., Torres, D., McLeod, B. A., & Coleman, D. (2018). When they return: Framing the argument for inclusion. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 3(3), 149-157. doi:

van Wormer, K. (2004). Confronting oppression, restoring justice: From policy analyses to social action. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.

Violence Against Women Act of 1994, P.L. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1902.

Walker, G. A. (1990). Family violence and the women’s movement: The conceptual politics of struggle. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Weick, A. (1992). Building a strengths perspective for social work. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 18-26). NY: Longman.

Weick, A. (1993). Reconstructing social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 8(1/2), 11-30.