Community Autonomy and Place-Based Environmental Research
Recognizing and Reducing Risks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/26440Keywords:
Place-based research, research ethics, environmental research, community-based researchAbstract
Academic and government-directed research is generally portrayed as a benign problem-solving enterprise. There is a long record of important theories, discoveries, and solutions to sticky problems that research has produced. But alongside this list of important advances in knowledge, there has been a record of damage to individuals and to communities as a whole when place-based research has not been implemented thoughtfully. Researchers conducting community-facing projects are increasingly aware that place-based research may generate risks at a community level. This literature review identifies a set of dynamics through which place-based environmental research projects can undermine community autotomy where research takes place and offers a set of recommendations for researchers and institutions who wish to adopt research practices and institutional supports that honor community autonomy.
References
Álvarez, L. & Coolsaet, B. (2018). Decolonizing environmental justice studies: A Latin American
perspective. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 31(2), 50-69.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1558272
Baker, K., Eichhorn, M., & Griffiths, M. (2019) Decolonizing field ecology. Biotropica, 51 (3), 288-292.
https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12663
Büscher, B. & Fletcher, R. (2019) Towards convivial conservation. Conservation and Society, 17(3), 283-
https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_19_75
Castelo Branco Araujo, F., & de Aguiar Portela Moita, E. (2018) The problems of under-inclusion in
marine biodiversity conservation: The case of Brazilian traditional fishing communities. Asian Bioethics Review, 10, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-018-0068-6
Chicago Beyond (2018). Why Am I Always Being Researched? A Guidebook for Community
Organizations, Researchers, and Funders to Help Us Get From Insufficient Understanding to More Authentic Truth. Chicago, IL. https://chicagobeyond.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/05/ChicagoBeyond_2019Guidebook.pdf
The Community Research Collaborative (2021). In It Together: Community-Based Research Guidelines for Communities and Higher Education. Salt Lake City, UT.
https://d2vxd53ymoe6ju.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2021/05/12143439/CRC- Guidelines-May-12-2021.pdf
Cooper, C., Shanley, L., Scassa, T., & Vayena, E. (2019). Project categories to guide institutional oversight of responsible conduct of scientists leading citizen science in the United States. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1): 7, 1-9. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.202
Cordner, A., Ciplet, D., Brown, P., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2012) Reflexive research ethics for
environmental health and justice: Academics and movement-building. Social Movement Studies, 11(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.664898
Costello, M., Beard, K., Corlett, R., Cumming, G., Devictor, V., Loyola, R., Maas, B., Miller-Rushing, A.,
Pakeman, R., & Primack, R. (2016). Field work ethics in biological research. Biological Conservation, 203, 268-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.008
Cvitanovic, C., Howden, M., Colvin, R.M., Norström, A., Meadow, A., Addison, P.F.E. (2019). Maximising
the benefits of participatory climate adaptation research by understanding and managing the associated challenges and risks. Environmental Science and Policy, 94, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.028
Datta, R. (2018). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous
research. Research Ethics, 14(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117733296
Davis, L. & Ramírez-Andreotta, M. (2021). Participatory research for environmental justice: A critical
interpretive synthesis. Environmental Health Perspectives: 129(2). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6274
Dev, L. (2018). Plant Knowledges: Indigenous Approaches and Interspecies Listening Toward
Decolonizing Ayahuasca Research. In B. Caiuby Labate and C. Cavnar (Eds.), Plant Medicines, Healing and Psychedelic Science (pp. 185-204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76720-8_11
Flicker, S., Travers R., Guta, A., McDonald, S., & Meagher, A. (2007) Ethical dilemmas in community-
based participatory research: Recommendations for institutional review boards. Journal of Urban Health, 84 (4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7
Friesen, P., Kearns, L., Redman, B., & Caplan, A. (2015). Rethinking the Belmont Report? The American
Journal of Bioethics, 17(7), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1329482
Friesen, P., Kearns, L., Redman, B., & Caplan, A. (2017). Extending ethical strides: From tribal IRBs to the
Bronx Community Research Review Board. The American Journal of Bioethics, 12(11), W5-W8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1378755
Gilbert, S. (2006). Supplementing the traditional institutional review board with an environmental health and community review board. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(10).
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9005
Harding, A., Harper, B., Stone, D., O’Neill, C., Berger, P., Harris, S., & Donatuto, J. (2012). Conducting
research with tribal communities: Sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(1). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103904
Held, M. (2019). Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism: An unsettling,
mutual, and collaborative effort. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918821574
Holland, B. (2017). Procedural justice in local climate adaptation: political capabilities and
transformational change. Environmental Politics, 26 (3), 391-
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1287625
Kwan, C. & Walsh, C. (2018). Ethical issues in conducting community-based participatory research: A
narrative review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 23(2), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3331
Lainé, N. (2018). Asian elephant conservation: Too elephantoocentric? Towards a biocultural approach
of conservation. Asian Bioethics Review, 10(4). 279-293.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-018-0070-z
Lajaunie, C. (2018). From a variety of ethics to the integrity and congruence of research on biodiversity
conservation. Asian Bioethics Review, 10, 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-018-0072-x
LaRocco, A., Shinn, J., & Madise, K. (2019). Reflections on positionalities in social science fieldwork in
northern Botswana: A call for decolonizing research. Politics & Gender, 16(3), 845-873. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000059
Long, J.W., Ballard, H.L., Fisher, L.A., & Belsky, J.M. (2015). Questions that won't go away in
participatory research. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 29(2), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1024368
Marsh, H. & Kenchington, R. (2004). The role of ethics in experimental marine biology and ecology.
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 300, 5-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2003.11.024
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
(1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. [Bethesda, Md.]: The Commission.
Quigley, D. (2016). Applying “place” to research ethics and cultural competence/humility training.
Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9251-5
Rasmussen, L. (2019) Confronting research misconduct in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and
Practice. 4(1), 10. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.207
Resnik, D. (2019) Citizen scientists as human subjects: Ethical issues. Citizen Science: Theory and
Practice, 4(1):11, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.150
Seamster, L. & Purifoy, D. (2020). What is environmental racism for? Place-based harm and relational
development. Environmental Sociology, 7(2), 110-121.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2020.1790331
Skandrani, Z. (2018). Decolonizing ecological research. Journal of Environmental Studies and Science,
(3), 368-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0501-x
Snow, K., Hays, D., Ford, D., Mwenda, J., & Scott, W. (2016). Guiding principles for indigenous research
practices. Action Research, 14(4), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315622542
St. John, F., Brockington, D., Bunnefeld, N., Duffy, R. Homewood, K., Jones, J., Keane, A., Milner- Gulland, E., Nuno, A., & Razafimanahaka, J. (2016). Research ethics: Assuring anonymity at the individual level may not be sufficient to protect research participants from harm. Biological Conservation, 196, 208-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.025
Tuck, Eve (2009). Suspending damage: a letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409
–428. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
Vohland, K., Weißflug, M., & Pettibone, L. (2019). Citizen science and the neoliberal transformation of
science – an ambivalent relationship. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.186
White House (2021). The Path to Achieving Justice40. [Washington, D.C.]
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/briefing-room/2021/07/20/the-path-to-achieving-
justice40/
Wilson, S. Wilson, O., Heaney, C., & Cooper, J. (2007). Use of EPA collaborative problem-solving model to obtain environmental justice in North Carolina. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 1(4), 27-337. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2007.0036
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jennifer Britton, Hugh Johnson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
