A Framework for Justice-Centering Relationships: Implications for Impact in Place-Based Community Engagement

Authors

  • Melissa Quan Fairfield University Center for Social Impact

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18060/26450

Keywords:

Community engagement, community impact, student learning, place-based community engagement, epistemic justice

Abstract

Community engagement in higher education has been promoted as critical to fulfilling higher education’s responsibility to the public good through teaching, learning, and knowledge generation. Reciprocity and mutual benefit are key principles of community engagement that connote a two-way exchange of knowledge and outcomes. However, it is not clear from existing literature whether community engagement impacts communities in positive ways. 

The problem addressed through this study was how campus-community partnership stakeholders define impact. Using grounded theory, the ways community and campus partners defined, measured, and understood community impact in a diverse set of campus-community partnerships at two U.S. urban, Jesuit universities that employ place-based approach to community engagement were explored. Relationships as facilitators of impact and as impacts in and of themselves emerged as central themes. Themes from the data led to the development of the Justice-Centering Relationships Framework which includes two paradigms for understanding community impact in higher education community engagement – Plug-and-Play and Justice-Centering Relationships – that are bridged by a Reframing process. The Framework contributes to and informs the “how” of taking a place-based community engagement approach that leads to positive benefits for community impact, student learning and formation, and institutional change.

References

Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(3), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500304

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941

Butin, D. W. (2003). Of what use is it? multiple conceptualizations of service learning within education. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1674-1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810310500903

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2015). Elective community engagement classification, first-time classification documentation framework. Retrieved from http://nerche.org/images/stories/projects/Carnegie/2015/2015_first-time_framework.pdf

Catala, A. (2015). Democracy, trust, and epistemic justice. The Monist, 98(4), 424-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onv022

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd Ed.). London: Sage.

Community-Campus Partnerships for Health. (1998). Principles of Good Community Campus Partnerships. Retrieved from https://www.ccphealth.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/10/confproc1998.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1086/317417

Cruz, N. I., & Giles, D. E. (2000). Where’s the community in service-learning research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7(1), 28-34. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.spec.104

Cruz, N. (2017). Centering communities in search of moral brilliance [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&app=desktop&v=yuj5JcSJiks

Enos, S., & Morton, K. (2003). Developing a theory and practice of campus-community partnerships. Building Partnerships for Service-Learning (pp. 20-41). San Francisco: CA: John Wiley and Sons.

Jacoby, B. (Ed.). (2003). Building partnerships for service-learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Jameson, J., Clayton, P., & Jaeger, A. (2010). Community engaged scholarship as mutually transformative partnerships. In L.M. Harter, J. Hamel-Lambert, & J. Millesen (Eds.), Participatory partnerships for social action and research (pp. 259-277). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.

Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Mitchell, T. D. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14(2), 50. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0014.205

Murray, R. (2020). Ignatian Leadership and Place-Based Learning. Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal 9(2). https://epublications.regis.edu/jhe/vol9/iss2/2

Ramaley, J. A. (2000). The perspective of a comprehensive university. In T. Ehrlich (Ed.), Civic responsibility and higher education (pp. 227-248). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Rubin, V. (2000). Evaluating university-community partnerships: An examination of the evolution of questions and approaches. Cityscape, 219-230. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20868505

Saltmarsh, J., Hartley, M., & Clayton, P. (2009). Democratic engagement white paper. Boston, MA: New England Resource Center for Higher Education. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/274

Sandy, M., & Holland, B. A. (2006). Different worlds and common ground: Community partner perspectives on campus-community partnerships. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(1), 30-43. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0013.103

Shah, R. W. (2020). Rewriting Partnerships: Community Perspectives on Community-Based Learning. Louisville, CO: University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607329602

Simpson, J. S. (2014). Longing for justice: Higher education and democracy's agenda. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442619661

Stoecker, R. (2016). Liberating service learning and the rest of higher education civic engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v30i3.429

Stoecker, R., Tryon, E. A., & Hilgendorf, A. (Eds.). (2009). The unheard voices: Community organizations and service learning. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Sturm, S., Eatman, T., Saltmarsh, J., & Bush, A. (2011). Full participation: Building the architecture for diversity and public engagement in higher education. White Paper, Columbia University Law School, Center for Institutional and Social Change. https://surface.syr.edu/ia/17

Torres, J., & Schaffer, J. (2000). Benchmarks for campus/community partnerships. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.

Tuck, E. (2018). Biting the university that feeds us. In Spooner, M. & McNinch, J. (Eds.) Dissident knowledge in higher education, 149-167. University of Regina Press.

Wallerstein, N., Oetzel, J., Duran, B., Tafoya, G., Belone, L., & Rae, R. (2011). What predicts outcomes in CBPR. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes, (pp. 371-388). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73-106. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0027

Yamamura, E., & Koth, K. (2018). Place-Based Community Engagement in Higher Education: A Strategy to Transform Universities and Communities. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-08